Orthogonality of time dependent vector derivatives of constant magnitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the orthogonality of the derivative of a time-dependent vector function with constant magnitude. It is clarified that if the vector function r(t) maintains a constant magnitude, then the derivative r dot must be orthogonal to r. This is demonstrated by differentiating the equation r^2 = r(t) · r(t), leading to insights about the relationship between the vector and its derivative. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the implications of constant magnitude on the derivative's properties. The conversation highlights the mathematical reasoning behind this orthogonality concept.
lordkelvin
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding why a derivative of a time dependent vector function is orthogonal to the original function. Can anybody give me some enlightenment? I searched around for some previous talk about this, and I can't find anything.

Thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You have to be a bit more specific... I don't understand your question right now.
 
Does the time-dependent vector have constant magnitude?
 
Yes the original vector function is of constant magnitude. Take a vector function r(t) of constant magnitude and then r dot should be orthogonal to r. I don't understand why.
 
Take the derivative with respect to time of both sides of

r^2 = \bold{r}\left( t \right) \cdot \bold{r}\left( t \right).

What do you get?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top