Orthogonality on Inner Product (Quantum Mechanics also)

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Consider a qubit in the state |v> ∈ ℂ^2. Suppose that a measurement of δn is made on the qubit. Show that the probability of obtaining the result "+1" in the measurement is equal to 0 if and only if |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal.

Homework Equations


Inner product axioms
|v>|w> are orthogonal if |v>|w> = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


First things first, that this is a if and only if proof.
a. Prob(+1) = 0 implies that |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal
b. |v> and |n,+> are orthogonal implies Prob(+1) = 0

Proof of b: Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 , but since |n,+> and |v> are orthogonal as assumed, by definition of orthogonality, this is equal to 0. And so Prob(+1) = 0.

Proof of a: Similarly, Prob(+1) = | |n,+> |v> |^2 and since this equals 0, we see that |n,+>|v> = 0. But this is precisely the definition of orthogonality.

My concern: My concern is mainly with the proof of a, it seems very weak. Would you consider this a proper proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One little bump before the week starts. :)
 
To make the proof less "handwavy", I would start from the fact that ##\left|\pm n \right\rangle## form a complete basis, i.e., one can always write
$$
\left|\psi \right\rangle = a \left| +n \right\rangle + b \left|-n \right\rangle
$$
and deduce things about the values of ##a## and ##b##.

Also, please note that the inner product is noted <v|w>, not |v>|w>. |v> is a column vector, and <v| a row vector.
 
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
Thanks for the help here. That's a good idea and may make it a stronger proof.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top