Orthographic critique about an arxiv paper

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arxiv Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the presence of numerous orthographic errors and unclear sentences in a specific arXiv paper. Participants note that arXiv does not have a formal review process, allowing a wide range of submissions, including poorly written papers. This lack of oversight raises questions about the quality of content available on the platform. The original poster expresses surprise at the paper's acceptance and considers whether it might be better suited for a different language. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of critical evaluation when using arXiv as a resource.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272
I didn't know where to post this question, so I'm sorry if I did it in the wrong section.
I've fell over the following paper : http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.2790.pdf.
I don't know if it's just me, or the paper has plenty of orthographic errors and some incomprehensible sentences. (English is not my mother tongue.) If it' not just me, then how do this paper came to be posted and accepted on arxiv? Maybe it should have been better in Russian... what do you think/say?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no review process for the Arxiv. Papers get posted, not "accepted". All sorts of rubbish can be - and is - posted there.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
There is no review process for the Arxiv. Papers get posted, not "accepted". All sorts of rubbish can be - and is - posted there.

I wasn't aware of this. This is good to know since I'm a sophomore and I plan on consulting arxiv papers in a near future.
Thanks Vanadium.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top