Lacy33
- 242
- 1
Wow! Higher Powers DO intercede on our behalf to keep us from getting skinned alive! 

Proton Soup said:they need to release the photos. because the way they've handled things after the operation makes it look like they are hiding something. they disposed of the body quickly when there was no real need. they could have brought in witnesses from various press to view the body without taking photos, but they did not. they first said they were willing to take him alive, but said he resisted, but he either did not or the resistance was minimal. there was no armed resistance encountered at all. without evidence of a body, people may just assume he is alive and being subject to interrogation in guantanamo. perhaps the idea of a bin laden being waterboarded or worse is more damaging than the image of a bin laden with a gaping head wound.
Newai said:Will that work? Will they really believe the photos are real? Because if they don't believe Obama standing in front of the world making a claim like this...
russ_watters said:I heard some new analysis on the radio today I thought was interesting:
The US forces were on the ground for 40 minutes and came in massive helicpoters. Where were the Pakistanis for those 40 minutes? How could no one have responded to the interdiction, whether military, police, crowd of gawking onlookers, etc?
Note it is unconfirmed though.Residents describe hearing three explosions several minutes apart, followed by a huge explosion that shook their houses and knocked crockery from shelves. Most residents said they then also heard gunshots, but that the firing was brief, just a couple of minutes or so.
As the explosions started, they say, the lights in the area went off, going on and off again shortly afterwards. One report quotes some residents as saying they were commanded in Pashto - not the common language of the area - to turn their lights off, but this is unconfirmed.
Proton Soup said:it won't work for everyone. especially if they release something fairly low resolution. like i said, i think they've already screwed up by doing all of this body disposal in private. but surely they've got a huge amount of video and photography available. it would be hard to fake a large amount, easy to fake a still for public consumption. so bring in the major news orgs, including al jazeera, and let them view the stuff.
as for witnesses who were taken in custody, i guess we'll have to wait to see exactly what they saw.
russ_watters said:I heard some new analysis on the radio today I thought was interesting:
The US forces were on the ground for 40 minutes and came in massive helicpoters. Where were the Pakistanis for those 40 minutes? How could no one have responded to the interdiction, whether military, police, crowd of gawking onlookers, etc?
I suppose the answers aren't much different from what we already heard in response to the "how didn't they know?" Question: Incompetence, ambivalence or complicity are the three possible answers.
Ivan Seeking said:I have been told that Trump is demanding that the long-form death certificate be released.
Whether they knew or were just incompetent, it certainly is a legitimate gripe. I wouldn't bang a war drum, though, I'd just stop giving them billions of dollars in aid. We're paying them to do something they aren't doing.Proton Soup said:the thing that bothered me on the first day of this were people on NPR (sorry, don't remember the names, but could probably find it on their site with a little work) that seemed to be banging the war drum against pakistan. the allegation was made that perhaps 1000's of people there must have known he was there but didn't say anything. therefore, we have a legitimate gripe against pakistan.
I don't think the failure you are alleging for the US would be equivalent to the Pakistani failure: they (presumably) have several million more people looking for him in Pakistan than we do....of course, the implications are that you can have massive conspiracies where no one spills the beans. and that our intelligence is extremely poor if we can't uncover something supposedly so well-known.
russ_watters said:I heard some new analysis on the radio today I thought was interesting:
The US forces were on the ground for 40 minutes and came in massive helicpoters. Where were the Pakistanis for those 40 minutes? How could no one have responded to the interdiction, whether military, police, crowd of gawking onlookers, etc?
I suppose the answers aren't much different from what we already heard in response to the "how didn't they know?" Question: Incompetence, ambivalence or complicity are the three possible answers.
lisab said:It's pretty mysterious. Perhaps the locals were used to helicopters due to the nearby military academy...? But that doesn't explain why those in the military academy didn't respond.
I'm not sure what the local "military academy" is about. It is being sold as the Pakistani equivalent of West Point. But if that's what it is, then:lisab said:It's pretty mysterious. Perhaps the locals were used to helicopters due to the nearby military academy...? But that doesn't explain why those in the military academy didn't respond.
Evo said:I think it's a good move, there's no reason to see gore and it would only inflame those inclined to hate the US.
The US forces were on the ground for 40 minutes and came in massive helicpoters. Where were the Pakistanis for those 40 minutes? How could no one have responded to the interdiction, whether military, police, crowd of gawking onlookers, etc?
This is a good point, Bush failed to capture or kill Bin Laden, and Obama deserves credit for this huge accomplishment. If we're going to beat the guy up in all those other threads because we think he deserves it, we should give him credit in this thread where he deserves it.turbo-1 said:Let's not turn this into a left-right argument please. It seems you have conveniently left out an intervening President who wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive" one year, and claimed that his capture was not a priority the next year.
In this technological age, a picture posted online would never constitute proof to doubters. The proof is in the fact that if Bin Ladin were still alive and free, he could easily make it publicly known.Museigen said:I can see what you guys are saying. I guess I'm coming from the position of just wanting some kind of proof.
Al68 said:The proof is in the fact that if Bin Ladin were still alive and free, he could easily make it publicly known.
russ_watters said:Whether they knew or were just incompetent, it certainly is a legitimate gripe. I wouldn't bang a war drum, though, I'd just stop giving them billions of dollars in aid. We're paying them to do something they aren't doing. I don't think the failure you are alleging for the US would be equivalent to the Pakistani failure: they (presumably) have several million more people looking for him in Pakistan than we do.
I am quoting one of the few areas in where I want to see improvement in.One early effort in education already appears to be a cautionary tale. Improving schooling in the country has been a key focus of U.S. development efforts, both to undermine the need for and appeal of religious schools (or madrasahs) and to advance literacy, which is 43% among adults; two-thirds of Pakistani women cannot read or write. In long, jargon-filled reports, the principal USAID contractor on an $83 million, five-year education-sector reform project, North Carolina–headquartered RTI (also known as Research Triangle Institute), claims to have "positively impacted" more than 400,000 students (out of 70 million school-age kids) through strengthening policy and planning, teacher and school-administrator training, and youth and adult literacy. But when USAID's inspector general sent a team over in August 2007 to check on the progress, it could not validate the claims because the USAID mission in Islamabad "did not require RTI to adhere to reporting requirements critical to monitoring the program performance." The problem was serious enough for RTI, which derived close to 40% of its $710 million in revenues last year from USAID, to be disqualified from follow-on contracts on this particular project.
I don't assume he would necessarily want it known he's alive, I assume only that there's a significant possibility that he would want it known he's alive, which would be more than enough reason for us not to risk lying about it.DaveC426913 said:Not that I feel the need to argue against his death but:
Why do you assume Bin Laden would want it known that he's alive? If everyone thought he was dead, it would take the heat off and he might get more done. I see it in every cop movie; it's got to be true.
Al68 said:I don't assume he would necessarily want it known he's alive, I assume only that there's a significant possibility that he would want it known he's alive, which would be more than enough reason for us not to risk lying about it.
Al68 said:I don't assume he would necessarily want it known he's alive, I assume only that there's a significant possibility that he would want it known he's alive, which would be more than enough reason for us not to risk lying about it.
Proton Soup said:if you're going to consider the possibility that he's alive, then you must also consider the alive-but-in-custody possibility. that would invalidate your proof.
Proton Soup said:interesting there was a video blackout. also, the thing about his daughter. still not clear if she witnessed his death.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ackout-during-raid-on-bin-Laden-compound.html
PS's link said:Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
Obama? Osama? Obama? Osama?
Oh what the hell, let's just shoot this one, he's a known mass murderer. And this other guy, well, he's our boss.
Yes, I neglected to specify "alive and free" in that last post like I did in my earlier one. That "proof" does not preclude his being alive but secretly in custody.Proton Soup said:if you're going to consider the possibility that he's alive, then you must also consider the alive-but-in-custody possibility. that would invalidate your proof.
turbo-1 said:BTW, folks, al-Qaida has confirmed bin Laden's death. I think we can put an end to speculation that he is being detained and questioned.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/06/osama-bin-laden-dead-al-qaeda_n_858440.html
SEAL dogs.fuzzyfelt said:Wow. They must be so well trained, they look so trusting.
Amen...Evo said:SEAL dogs.![]()
rhody said:All I have to say to these pictures is... Wow... see attachments and this http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...tary-dog-jumping-out-of-a-helicopter/238431/". I don't get choked up easily, however, this did it for me...
Rhody...
rhody said:On top of that, the first picture, the SEAL is wearing oxygen, so that was a High Altitude, Low Opening Jump (HALO), and you can't see in the picture but I am almost sure the dog has a special oxygen mask on too, that is amazing.
Rhody...![]()
WhoWee said:His wife was an eyewitness to his death - there never was a legitimate doubt.
rhody said:All I have to say to these pictures is... Wow... see attachments and this http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...tary-dog-jumping-out-of-a-helicopter/238431/". I don't get choked up easily, however, this did it for me...
Rhody...
1MileCrash said:Anyone else just not care?
Lacy,Lacy33 said:Do NOT try this with cats!![]()
Evo said:Navy SEAL dog.
Ivan Seeking said:What do you call SEALs decorated with colored lights? Christmas SEALS.
rootX said:My friend observed that people have never been so fascinated by someone's death since the Harry Potter antagonist death.
Telegraph yesterday said:Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.
Telegraph today said:Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals, rather than Mr Obama, made the final decision to kill bin Laden.
rhody said:Lacy,
If the HALO SEAL had managed to stow a cat where the dog was, he would need his bullet proof vest to keep his chest from being torn to shreds !
Rhody...![]()
russ_watters said:Apparently he was still very much in charge: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2011-05-06-bin-laden-al-qaeda_n.htm
russ_watters said:Apparently he was still very much in charge: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2011-05-06-bin-laden-al-qaeda_n.htm