Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
This thread is dedicated to sharing and appreciating videos, photos, and animations of space and celestial objects, emphasizing the beauty of the Universe. Participants are encouraged to include scientific information alongside their contributions, while adhering to forum guidelines regarding mainstream science.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant initiates the thread by inviting others to share clips and photos of space, highlighting the beauty of the Universe.
- Several participants share specific video clips, including time-lapse footage from the ISS and NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory.
- Another participant mentions the upcoming capture of the Dawn spacecraft by Ceres, expressing excitement about future images from the New Horizons mission to Pluto.
- One participant recalls a clip titled "The Known Universe" and reflects on its emotional impact while viewing the Milky Way.
- Another shares a video about NASA astronaut Don Pettit experimenting with water in a weightless environment, noting its relevance to the thread's theme.
- Some participants discuss the Digital Universe software, expressing mixed feelings about its representation of the solar system and the Milky Way.
- A participant creatively describes the dynamics of Earth's atmosphere, drawing parallels to celestial phenomena and inviting further exploration of the topic.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
The discussion features a variety of contributions and perspectives, with no clear consensus on specific interpretations or representations of the shared content. Participants express personal reflections and emotional responses to the videos and images, indicating a shared appreciation for the beauty of the Universe while maintaining individual viewpoints.
Contextual Notes
Some posts reference specific scientific missions and software, but the discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications and interpretations of the shared materials.
- 9,715
- 11,744
bruha said:Hi still one image (mybe little beter), at least more alike I found on net...![]()
![]()
yes definitely better focussed
Hopefully in a couple of years we will start seeing the Sun looking like the second image
- 391
- 517
- 1,076
- 765
72min of 2hr exposure - 36 x 2min - 1000mm f/10 - Bortle 2
Nikkor-Reflex focal 500mm f/5 + Nikon TC-201 2x teleconverter on Nikon D800
| Center (RA, Dec): | (198.965, 42.031) |
| Center (RA, hms): | 13h 15m 51.710s |
| Center (Dec, dms): | +42° 01' 51.521" |
| Size: | 32.2 x 21.5 arcmin |
| Radius: | 0.323 deg |
| Pixel scale: | 1 arcsec/pixel |
- 1,076
- 765
- 2,174
- 9,926
They covered many different aspects. A couple of things that are staggering is e.g. to imagine such massive objects as supermassive black holes spinning at such astounding speeds, and also the amount of energy released (and power) when black holes merge. It is mindblowing
.There was a series of nice comparison pictures and animations in the first lecture at 35 m 42 s and onwards.
The Physics of Black Holes - with Chris Impey
Q&A: The Physics of Black Holes - with Chris Impey
Black Holes and the Fundamental Laws of Physics - with Jerome Gauntlett
- 1,076
- 765
With my 600mm f/9 and 1000mm f/10 setups, its practically impossible to tell sometimes where I’m pointing through the view finder because the picture is so dark with such high aperature #’s, so I got a USB to Lightning adapter for transferring photos directly from my DSLR to my iphone photo library. From there I simply upload a test shot for plate solving to:
http://nova.astrometry.net/upload
...and it tells me exactly where I’m pointed. No more shooting for an hour and a half only to find out I was pointing at a completely different area of sky than intended.
Last night I had brought out my laptop, downloaded a pic from camera to laptop then airdropped to phone then uploaded to nova.astrometry.net/upload but my computer froze (literally, no pun intended) and wouldn’t restart til plugged in (I was a 30 minute drive from home in a bortle 2). I was about to order an inverter for my car to power the laptop but then I thought, why bother if I can go straight from DSLR into the phone.
It was almost sheer luck I was able to successfully aim the 1000mm setup at the sunflower galaxy last night without using plate solving.
- 1,076
- 765
- 3,950
- 777
Hmmm... Not how I imagined you would use that!Devin-M said:another upgrade to help w/ pointing... green laser w/ telescope mount attached via macro focusing rail:
View attachment 278343
- 1,076
- 765
- 1,076
- 765
Heart Nebula - IC 1805 - Sharpless 2-190 - 7500 light years
2hr exposure - 60 x 2min - 12800iso - 600mm f/9 - Moonlit Bortle 2 (2/20/21)
Nikon focal 300mm f/4.5 + Nikon TC-301 2x teleconverter
Nikon D800 w/ Star Adventurer 2i Equatorial Mount
Finally had a successful evening after many cloudy ones... I drove 30 miles to a Bortle 2 east of Redding, California, USA. The only downside was the moon was out and definitely affected the pictures. Tried out attaching the green laser to the camera for the first time and plate-solving with the plug from dslr to iphone ( http://nova.astrometry.net/upload ) -- I'd say it was revolutionary. I didn't even look through the viewfinder or at the live view at all. I figured out on the Stellarium app my phone where I wanted to point the camera, then aimed the green laser (after syncing the laser and camera on the north star), then took a test shot, downloaded to phone, plate-solved and adjusted till aim achieved. It was far easier than trying to look through the viewfinder and figure out where I'm pointed. Focused through Bahtinov mask, 40 darks & 40 flats. Took photos of the Heart Nebula and the Great Galactic Face in Markarian's Chain of galaxies.
Center (RA, Dec): (38.105, 61.368)
Center (RA, hms): 02h 32m 25.087s
Center (Dec, dms): +61° 22' 04.363"
Size: 2.52 x 1.68 deg
Radius: 1.513 deg
Pixel scale: 4.72 arcsec/pixel
- 1,076
- 765
Great Galactic Face - Markarian's Chain - M86 - M84 - NGC 4388 - NGC 4387 - 52 - 65 million light years
2hr exposure - 60 x 2min - 12800iso - 600mm f/9 - Moonlit Bortle 2 (2/20/21)
Nikon focal 300mm f/4.5 + Nikon TC-301 2x teleconverter
Nikon D800 w/ Star Adventurer 2i Equatorial Mount
Center (RA, Dec): (186.432, 12.801)
Center (RA, hms): 12h 25m 43.624s
Center (Dec, dms): +12° 48' 04.830"
Size: 40.6 x 27 arcmin
Radius: 0.406 deg
Pixel scale: 1.68 arcsec/pixel
- 259
- 489
- 2,174
- 9,926
chemisttree said:I used 1/503 sec and the ISO that made that work on the moon.
DennisN said:I will definitely try with various settings the next time.
Moongazing/moon photo session:
Last evening/night I photographed the Moon and tried various new camera settings (shutter speeds 1/500 s and 1/1000 s at ISO 50, 100 and 200), along with new stacking settings and new editing in Photoshop.
Even though I only used my small monocular (diameter 40 mm), I got very pleased with the result.
It became the best photo of the Moon I've taken so far.
I guess I understand now why this hobby can be so addictive; over a long period of time you try, change things and then try again etc, in order to improve the results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gear used: 40 mm monocular, tripod, LG G4 phone.
Photo settings: ISO 100, 1/1000 s shutter speed, DNG (uncompressed)
Stacking info: 25 stacked photos (50% of the photos), Drizzle 1.5 incl. Sharpening and 50% mix in of the original photos.
Software used: Open Camera (Android) -> PIPP -> AutoStakkert -> Photoshop
Photoshop edits: (1) increased contrast (2) Shadows/Highlights: increased highlights and increased midtone contrast (no editing of "Shadows") and (3) slight increase of vibrance
Here's the monocular I used, with a very technically advanced stray light shield made of black paper fastened with masking tape
- 1,076
- 765
Markarian's Chain (of Galaxies) - M86 - M84 - NGC 4388 - NGC 4387 - 52 to 65 million light years
2hr exposure - 60 x 2min - 12800iso - 600mm f/9 - Moonlit Bortle 2 (2/20/21)
Nikon focal 300mm f/4.5 + Nikon TC-301 2x teleconverter
Nikon D800 w/ Star Adventurer 2i Equatorial Mount
I wanted to do a bit more processing than normal before posting this image. I edited out all the foreground stars so almost every point of light in the above image is an entire galaxy.
Full Frame w/ Stars:
Center (RA, Dec): (186.947, 12.897)
Center (RA, hms): 12h 27m 47.179s
Center (Dec, dms): +12° 53' 47.830"
Size: 3.01 x 2.01 deg
Radius: 1.810 deg
Pixel scale: 5.65 arcsec/pixel
- 9,715
- 11,744
looks totally weird without stars
- 2,174
- 9,926
Seeing a craft land on another planet, and filmed live, is just simply a-m-a-z-i-n-g.
Perseverance Rover’s Descent and Touchdown on Mars (Official NASA Video)
- 7,731
- 3,920
Devin-M said:
Thanks for this link! I gave it a try with one of my images (downscaled to 33%, 8-bit TIFF) and it worked!
Thanks!
- 1,076
- 765
Andy Resnick said:I gave it a try with one of my images (downscaled to 33%, 8-bit TIFF) and it worked!
I’ve started setting the quality setting on my dslr camera to capture both the RAW image and a low res jpg, so that while I’m trying to point the camera I can transfer the low res jpg from the dslr to iphone via the camera dongle, then upload to http://nova.astrometry.net/upload to find where I’m pointing, then I can adjust as needed til the aim is close to perfect. Also for plate solving, a 10 sec exposure is good enough, then when I’m pointed properly I crank the exposure time up to 2min, etc.
- 7,731
- 3,920
- 1,076
- 765
To me it looks like a lobster. M86, M84, NGC 4388, NGC 4387 are the face, NGC’s 4474, 4468, 4459 are the end of the tail, M87 & NGC 4371 are the claws. NGC 4402 is a raised eyebrow.davenn said:With stars
looks totally weird without stars
- 7,731
- 3,920
But it failed to identify a small smudge near the Ring nebula (I marked it with a square)- it's present in the SDSS survey but not named...? Any guesses?
- 1,076
- 765
- 7,731
- 3,920
http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=LEDA 2029852&NbIdent=1
- 3,950
- 777
Today’s SOHO image...
- 7,731
- 3,920
bruha said:Hello, still one sun green filt. image from today (sharpened and expos. adjusted with Gimp-I supose some granulation is recognizable ...![]()
![]()
chemisttree said:I can’t wait for solar activity to come back!
Today’s SOHO image...
What's that thing? Haven't seen it in months...
- 3,950
- 777
Are you observing using an aperture mask or full aperture? Here is an example of an aperture mask. Discussion here.bruha said:Hello, still one sun green filt. image from today (sharpened and expos. adjusted with Gimp-I supose some granulation is recognizable ...![]()
![]()
- 391
- 517
Thanks,,,
- 3,950
- 777
You will need 1 more filter to cover the small aperture in the tube cap.
Do you currently not have a full aperture solar filter of some kind?
Similar threads
- · Replies 30 ·
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 7 ·
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 76 ·
- Replies
- 76
- Views
- 7K
- · Replies 22 ·
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 91 ·
- Replies
- 91
- Views
- 22K
- · Replies 90 ·
- Replies
- 90
- Views
- 10K
- · Replies 1 ·
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 1 ·
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 6K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 3 ·
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 1K
