Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #1,501
Flame Nebula (NGC 2024):

Flame_620x620.jpg


This one is noisier than the last one mostly because I only did 10 minutes of exposures (10x1min) instead of an hour, and also it's a much dimmer nebula than the last one so I was shooting 1 minute exposures instead of 30 seconds, and I was shooting at 4x the ISO sensitivity... 6400iso instead of 1600iso and I was shooting from a light polluted area (moonless bortle 6) - the other one was shot from the same location. This was on a 2180mm focal f/14.5 telescope as was the other.

view in WorldWideTelescope

4258184.png


4258184-1.png


4258184-2.png


5973724.jpeg


5973724-1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #1,502
Is anybody shooting the comet C2021/A1 (Leonard)? It has entered telescope magnitude range and is performing better than estimates.

My skies are completely cursed, was waiting for this one since a long time :headbang:
 
  • #1,503
DennisN said:
It's been cloudy here for weeks now, and I was tired of seeing the grey skies.

Finally I had a breakthrough...

A detail of Grey's Nebula (NGC #808080) in the constellation Greyhound. Since the amount of noise was so low there was no need to stack images. And the color reproduction is natural, no edits have been done.

Detail of Grey's Nebula (NGC #808080) (ISO 200, 1/160s exposure)
01 - Grey Clouds.jpg


The gear and the sky:
02 - Grey Gear.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, berkeman, Keith_McClary and 2 others
  • #1,504
DennisN said:
Finally I had a breakthrough...
Well done. Seems like a reflection nebula, hard to conclude from spectroscopy. I read somewhere that experts have theorized that the major constituents could be molecular Nitrogen, Oxygen and water vapor.
 
  • #1,505
:smile:o_O:woot:
 
  • #1,506
818C0FA7-AD74-4612-A07D-317EBA45F529.jpeg
 
  • #1,508
ClearOutside.com is my go-to for astro-forecasts. Works like a charm. Green means it's a "go" for astrophotography. It also shows whether the moon is up at a glance (which for me is to be avoided for deep-sky astrophotography), gives the bortle rating, and if you click on the days it shows a whole host of other info like winds, temperatures, ISS flyovers, and warns you if you'll be risking dew formation if the outside temperature will be very close to the dew point (which I ignored once and my cameras were soaking at the end of the night-- I was wiping down the lenses every 20 minutes).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,509
Wind gusts are predicted to be 18mph tonight with 10mph sustained so it's a no-go despite the clear conditions... but I did manage to test my scope this afternoon on some Eagles in lieu of the Eagle Nebula as the sun was going down...

C72A30DD-4F5E-4052-B413-816465D4290D.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Keith_McClary and collinsmark
  • #1,510
Summer milky way over the scouts camp in Czechia.

Sony A7 + Samyang 18/2.8 + Sky Watcher Star Adventurer
Foreground: panorama from 5 images, every is median form 3 photos
Sky: Panorama from 4 photos
Software: Photoshop, PixInsight, PTGui

My website: www.ondrejbruha.com
Tábor 2 (1).jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, Devin-M, DennisN and 2 others
  • #1,511
Devin-M said:
ClearOutside.com is my go-to for astro-forecasts. Works like a charm. Green means it's a "go" for astrophotography. It also shows whether the moon is up at a glance (which for me is to be avoided for deep-sky astrophotography), gives the bortle rating, and if you click on the days it shows a whole host of other info like winds, temperatures, ISS flyovers, and warns you if you'll be risking dew formation if the outside temperature will be very close to the dew point (which I ignored once and my cameras were soaking at the end of the night-- I was wiping down the lenses every 20 minutes).
I hear you.

There's an amazing number of things which have an influence, which I wasn't aware of until I started myself (e.g. weather, light pollution, the Moon (presence and phase), wind, temperature).

Recently I have planned some new potential good sites near me, where I can at best get down to Bortle 3.

And there are two interesting Bortle 2 sites reasonably near me, the two Danish islands Mön and Bornholm.

I find Mön particularly interesting since it's very sparsely populated, and I can reach it without taking any ship. There's also supposed to be very nice nature scenery there, e.g. Möns Klint. I am thinking about maybe going camping there for a week or two next spring or summer, and drive around the small island to take nature photos in the day, and doing astrophotography in the night. All depending on the weather, of course. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Devin-M and collinsmark
  • #1,512
Wave interference effects on star light after passing between the slits of a bahtinov focusing mask...

IMG-8283_bahtinov_crop_620x620.jpg


IMG-8283_bahtinov_full_spike_620x620.jpg

271514BE-CDF0-48D3-88E2-C6F4F3DCED19.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,513
I took this picture last night of "Casper the Friendly Ghost Nebula" also known as Messier 78 in moonless bortle 2 conditions near Shingletown, California, USA. It's a reflection nebula with a radius of about 5 light years and a distance of about 1350 light years from Earth in the constellation of Orion.

This noisy image is a result of under-exposure (both of the individual frames and the overall total exposure time of all the frames combined) and overzealous histogram stretching (twice) in Adobe Lightroom. The individual frames were 90 seconds long and I ended up with about 40 of them (I think only about 26 were good enough to stack) or about 1 hour exposure total on a 2180mm f/14.5 scope (Meade LX85 M6 1800mm f/12 Maksutov Cassegrain) at 6400iso with a Nikon D800 DSLR at prime focus & Star Adventurer 2i Pro tracker.

view in WorldWideTelescope

Casper_M78_620x620_double_stretched.jpg


4267934.png


4267934-1.png


4267934-2.png


5985929-1.jpeg


5985929.jpeg


76A97E85-5772-49A6-BCB4-A2BE32C5EE02.jpeg


795AA8B3-BF04-4F61-A4C3-FE8E67D6CD3C.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Keith_McClary and collinsmark
  • #1,515
Keith_McClary said:
Is there any place that analyses this data over time so we could look up which locations have how many hours of good conditions per year?
I don't know of any. That would be nice though.

Maybe one alternative method is to look up where the nearest big observatory is. There's a good chance that if somebody put a big observatory there, they probably researched the viability of the location.

Better yet, find a contact a local astronomy club. There's a good chance they might even have unique access to darker sky locations. For example, here in San Diego there's the SDAA that has access to a location out in the desert, well away from the marine layer, in the middle of nowhere, where the sky is dark and the weather is usually favorable. (I've never been out there yet due to laziness, but it's there.)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary, PhysicoRaj and DennisN
  • #1,516
Keith_McClary said:
Is there any place that analyses this data over time so we could look up which locations have how many hours of good conditions per year?
I found this (Sunniest Cities in the World):

https://assets3.thrillist.com/v1/image/2832143

Top 3 areas are Arizona, Egypt and Chile…

There’s also this map of Europe and the US…

OrJunPB.png
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,517
The Phantom Galaxy (M74) in the constellation Pisces. The galaxy is about 32 million light years away. Imaged from my back patio. Total integration time: 59.78 hours. Bortle Class 7 skies (maybe 8).

Phantom2021FinalSmall.jpg

Figure 1. Phantom Galaxy (Messier 74)

I started the first night of imaging by warming up some fish tacos in the back of the fridge that were about to go bad. I also cooked up a batch of off-brand fishsticks to go with the half-empty bottle of tarter sauce that's been in the fridge since the before times. This will become important later.

The Phantom Galaxy (M74) is arguably called the "phantom" because it is perhaps the most difficult of the Messier objects for amateur astronomers to observe, due to its low surface brightness.

A few hours into the first night of imaging, my gastrointestinal system started making all sorts of noises. There were high pitched screeches, baritone groans, and even some falsetto squawks. It was like an opera going on in there!

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF on a equatorial wedge
Optec Lepus 0.62x focal reducer
Astronomik RGB filters
Astronomik Ha filter
Optolong L-Pro filter
ZWO ASI1600MM-COOL monochrome camera

Software:
Nighttime Imaging 'N' Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PixInsight
Topaz Labs Denoise AI
GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP)

Before the first night was over, my digestive tract released several gaseous, ethereal, fish taco phantoms into the realm of the living. Although mostly invisible, they made their presence known and continued to linger around for what seemed like forever.

With the Phantom Galaxy's (M74's) low surface brightness, it took about 13 clearish nights to get this image. You might think that with nearly 60 hours of integration time, that it would turn out better. But keep in mind that I'm imaging from Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8) skies, and that's not even counting the neighborhood glare, of which there's plenty.

Here is an image of the telescope struggling with the Phantom Galaxy (M74). That glow in the sky isn't twilight: this snapshot was taken around 10 PM (22:00), roughly.

PXL_20211111_054352364.NIGHT.jpg

Figure 2. Telescope struggling with all the light pollution

The "Little Phantoms," as I came to call them, continued to hang around as the nights passed. They would float around and play games and curiously inspect the telescope. Inquisitive little things, they were. I think by the end, they quite interested in astronomy, and even offered to help out, in whatever strange way they could.

Integration:
L-Pro: 28.85 hours
R: 7.46 hours
G: 8.55 hours
B: 5.78 hours
Ha: 9.15 hours
Total: 59.78 hours

By the end of the imaging, I encouraged the Little Phantoms go out into the world on their own. They grow up so fast! They were reluctant at first. Then I put in a Star Wars movie, Episode I (the one where Anakin was a kid), and that seemed to convince them. We agreed that they are always welcome to come back to visit anytime in future seasons, particularly when the Phantom Galaxy (M74) is revisited. And we'll always have the fish tacos.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Andy Resnick, DennisN and Devin-M
  • #1,518
Stunning results! I love how you captured the very faint outer regions and the red h-alpha regions. Great work.

Edit: It's funny you posted this today as I had started to consider asking how you were coming along with this project...
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,519
I see what appears to be quite a few background galaxies / extended objects in there as well... it looks like about 4 of them in the upper right corner, one to the left of the bright star on the bottom right corner, one at the bottom in the center, and possibly another one on the far left side below the top left corner.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,520
collinsmark said:
Before the first night was over, my digestive tract released several gaseous, ethereal, fish taco phantoms into the realm of the living.
So it wasn't only light pollution you were fighting against. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #1,521
This is a single 10 minute exposure at 3200iso with no filters of the Wizard Nebula also known as NGC 7380 in Bortle 2 conditions... I shot this while waiting for Messier 78 to come above the horizon the other night, which was my primary target. Of the 12 or so 10 minute exposures I got this was the only one that came out with anything close to round stars, so I'm definitely butting up against the inherent limits of using a relatively cheap star tracker like the Star Adventurer 2i Pro... it's definitely not intended for 10 minute un-guided exposures at 2180mm focal length, so this picture is not very great but still not quite worthy of the trash-heap... I actually should have had the Ha filter inserted and this probably would have let me then composite just the nebulosity with some much shorter 30 second exposures I had gotten just for the RGB of the stars, but since I didn't put in the filter there's no way I can separate the nebulosity from the over-exposed stars in this picture and do a composite. In hindsight I should have recognized how badly these 10 minute exposures were coming out and cut my losses and swiveled to M78 much sooner and then I would have gotten a couple extra hours on that target which probably would have resulted in much less noise. After assessing these photos I think If I'm shooting straight RGB with no filters of a typical nebula in bortle 2 conditions, then 2 minutes per exposure at 6400iso seems like it may be the sweet spot when considering the weaknesses of the tracker on longer exposures, and the amount of noise to signal I get at 6400iso f/14.5.

view in WorldWideTelescope

IMG-8341-2.jpg


4274015.png


4274015-1.png


4274015-2.png


collinsmark said:
The "Little Phantoms," as I came to call them, continued to hang around as the nights passed. They would float around and play games and curiously inspect the telescope. Inquisitive little things, they were. I think by the end, they quite interested in astronomy, and even offered to help out, in whatever strange way they could.
I get something similar when I image in the driveway, but instead of "Little Phantoms" they carry the ignominious title of "Dumpster Kittens..."

255B00B3-BE5F-4D94-8C7C-2061691D1C39.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,523
jupiter_final_800x620.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Borg, DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,524
:smile: :thumbup:
 
  • #1,526
Phantom Galaxy (M74), reprocessed. It's from the same data as my last post (post #1517), but with a little bit of improved PixInisight-fu.

Phantom2021ReprocessedFinal.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes chemisttree, davenn, Keith_McClary and 2 others
  • #1,527
:thumbup: :smile:
 
  • #1,528
Finally got a break in the clouds- it's been over a month- so I made sure to maximize my imaging time, sleep be damned :)

Finishing up NGC 891 for the year: 800/8.0 lens, DX format, 4.8 hours @ ISO 64:

NGC_891-St-17580s-1.jpg


The fainter galaxies are starting to clearly appear- some structure is now visible (1:1 crop):

NGC_891-St-17580s-2.jpg


As NGC moves out of view, the Pleiades are rising- 800/8.0, FX format, only 3 hours (so far) @ ISO 64:

800mm_Pleiades-St-11368s-1.jpg


It's not obvious on the downscaled image, but stopping down the lens also produces great 'starburst' patterns:

1639581482099.png


And then Orion is ascending: 800/8.0, FX-ish format, 1 hour @ ISO 64:
800mm_Orion-St-3314s-1.jpg


The image is a little stretched because I wanted to also image NGC 1999, just visible at the bottom left (here, 1:1):

800mm_Orion-St-3314s-3.jpg


Meanwhile, I can still keep the Trapezium from blooming:

800mm_Orion-St-3314s-2.jpg


Last, a blast from the past- I found an ISS flyover time-lapse I took on 4/2/20, right as we went into lockdown; I had other matters on my mind at the time and forgot I even took this:



This was taken at 800/5.6, 1/2000 s shutter speed and ISO 640 (I think). When I image the Space Station, I begin by consulting this site and find out what the maximum magnitude will be. Then, once I get set up, I set the camera ISO according to a star that's about the same magnitude- the shutter speed must be fast to reduce motion blur, I've found 1/2000s works.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes TSny, pinball1970, chemisttree and 6 others
  • #1,529
:thumbup: :thumbup: :smile:
 
  • #1,530
Hi, watching your Pleiades, I remember my Pleidases attempt by CCD eyepiece camera with Newton 1000/200 mm. I attach both as illustration of zoom field difference. (on your image is marked cca my zoom view. o_O o_O :wideeyed:
 

Attachments

  • pleiades mark.jpg
    pleiades mark.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 111
  • Pleiady.jpg
    Pleiady.jpg
    2.9 KB · Views: 117
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K