Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
- 1,194
- 686
Following is an area of sky as shown by Stellarium with date set to 6th May 2024 at 4am. We are looking at the constellation of Sagittarius - more recently dubbed the "teapot asterism" - in the vicinity of the Milky Way's galactic centre. Well you might expect Sagittarius A to kick up a little bit of dust and it certainly does that! There are any number of interesting deep sky objects in this pic. In addition to the easily visible stars of the "teapot asterism", I highlight/link to the following as marked by Stellarium: (links are to Wikipedia articles)
NGC6530 / Lagoon Nebula. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_6530
M22 / Great Sagittarius Cluster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_22
M24 / Small Sagittarius Star Cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Sagittarius_Star_Cloud
M25 / Messier 25 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_25
And following is my pic of the same: (Canon EOS 600D 55m f/11 15 sec ISO 3200 6th May 4am). Well it's not very spectacular but I think the definition is good enough to identify most of what's shown in the Stellarium view above. (except NGC 6553 as far as I can see anyway!).
See also this pic. Worth zooming in just to see the staggering density of stars in this region.
NGC6530 / Lagoon Nebula. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGC_6530
M22 / Great Sagittarius Cluster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_22
M24 / Small Sagittarius Star Cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Sagittarius_Star_Cloud
M25 / Messier 25 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_25
And following is my pic of the same: (Canon EOS 600D 55m f/11 15 sec ISO 3200 6th May 4am). Well it's not very spectacular but I think the definition is good enough to identify most of what's shown in the Stellarium view above. (except NGC 6553 as far as I can see anyway!).
See also this pic. Worth zooming in just to see the staggering density of stars in this region.
Last edited:
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 3,443
- 3,414
The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024. The galaxy can be found in the constellation Virgo and is around 31 million light-years away. The Sombrero Galaxy is a little over a 100,000 light-years in diameter and contains a central, supermassive black hole with the mass of a billion suns.
Figure 1: The Sombrero Galaxy, M104, NGC 4594.
M104 is called "The Sombrero Galaxy" because it resembles a traditional, Mexican sombrero hat. To see the resemblance, it might help to look at the image upside down. You can do this by turning the image upside down, or alternatively, leaving the image as it is and turning yourself upside down. You'll see a glowing orb that looks to be wearing a 100,000 light-year wide sombrero on top.
I was so hoping to have this image finished and posted by May 5th (Cinco de Mayo), but alas, no. The clouds didn't allow it. San Diego has had overcast skies at night for weeks straight (even if it is sometimes sunny in the daytime). San Diego isn't very accommodating to astronomers in the spring season.
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 700×40 sec = 7.78 hrs
R: 445×60 sec = 7.42 hrs
G: 523×60 sec = 8.72 hrs
B: 368×60 sec = 6.13 hrs
Hα: 49×600 sec = 8.17 hrs
Total integration time: 38.21 hours
Below is an image of my telescope in action imaging the The Sombrero Galaxy.
Figure 2. C14 Edge HD pointed toward M104 one night when the galaxy was near the meridian.
Figure 1: The Sombrero Galaxy, M104, NGC 4594.
M104 is called "The Sombrero Galaxy" because it resembles a traditional, Mexican sombrero hat. To see the resemblance, it might help to look at the image upside down. You can do this by turning the image upside down, or alternatively, leaving the image as it is and turning yourself upside down. You'll see a glowing orb that looks to be wearing a 100,000 light-year wide sombrero on top.
I was so hoping to have this image finished and posted by May 5th (Cinco de Mayo), but alas, no. The clouds didn't allow it. San Diego has had overcast skies at night for weeks straight (even if it is sometimes sunny in the daytime). San Diego isn't very accommodating to astronomers in the spring season.
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 700×40 sec = 7.78 hrs
R: 445×60 sec = 7.42 hrs
G: 523×60 sec = 8.72 hrs
B: 368×60 sec = 6.13 hrs
Hα: 49×600 sec = 8.17 hrs
Total integration time: 38.21 hours
Below is an image of my telescope in action imaging the The Sombrero Galaxy.
Figure 2. C14 Edge HD pointed toward M104 one night when the galaxy was near the meridian.
Last edited:
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,170
- 9,848
Gorgeous!collinsmark said:The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024.

It's probably my favorite galaxy ever since I first saw it on a photo many, many years ago.
It is the 3D look of the galaxy which I think is just fantastic.
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,170
- 9,848
My friend sent me two interesting links to NASA live streams (including audio) I want to share...
I haven't watched any yet, and they seem to be offline at the moment, but I thought they could be fun to have going in the background sometimes...
ISS Stream 1:
Live High-Definition Views from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)
ISS Stream 2:
Live Video from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)
I haven't watched any yet, and they seem to be offline at the moment, but I thought they could be fun to have going in the background sometimes...
ISS Stream 1:
Live High-Definition Views from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)
ISS Stream 2:
Live Video from the International Space Station (Official NASA Stream)
- 7,699
- 3,787
DennisN has a well-timed post: the ISS just flew over me!
- 1,194
- 686
How do they estimate the mass of a galaxy's central black hole ? The Milky Way is about the same diameter but Sagittarius A is apparently a lot lighter.collinsmark said:The Sombrero Galaxy (M104, NGC 4594) taken from my back patio, April-May 2024. The galaxy can be found in the constellation Virgo and is around 31 million light-years away. The Sombrero Galaxy is a little over a 100,000 light-years in diameter and contains a central, supermassive black hole with the mass of a billion suns.
Ibix
Science Advisor
- 13,417
- 15,970
I would imagine the process is to estimate orbital velocities from Doppler shifts of spectral lines. Then calculate velocities as a function of radius in a model mass distribution of a disc with radially varying mass density. Find the mass distribution that gives you the velocities you see in the data.neilparker62 said:How do they estimate the mass of a galaxy's central black hole ? The Milky Way is about the same diameter but Sagittarius A is apparently a lot lighter.
If there's no SMBH I'd expect the velocity distribution to go to zero at the core of the galaxy, which will give you a fairly smooth mass distribution. If there's an SMBH I'd expect the velocities to increase near the core, and you'd see a large spike in the mass distribution at the center - that's the mass of your SMBH.
Last edited:
DennisN
Gold Member
- 2,170
- 9,848
The 2024 Milky Way photographer of the year (capturetheatlas.com)
"To help you find inspiration for your next astro images, below are the results of the seventh edition of our Milky Way Photographer of the Year, where we publish the best Milky Way images taken around the world."
https://capturetheatlas.com/milky-way-photographer-of-the-year/
One example:
“Milky Way at Morning Glory Pool” – Jerry Zhang
"To help you find inspiration for your next astro images, below are the results of the seventh edition of our Milky Way Photographer of the Year, where we publish the best Milky Way images taken around the world."
https://capturetheatlas.com/milky-way-photographer-of-the-year/
One example:
“Milky Way at Morning Glory Pool” – Jerry Zhang
- 7,699
- 3,787
It's taken longer than I expected, but I am finally getting a good panorama of the Virgo supercluster:
This panoramic assembly is about a 3 x 5 array of full-frame stacks I've generated since 2016, and a full size print at 200 dpi would be 8 feet on a side. At the center is Markarian's chain:
and in total there are easily several hundred galaxies in this image (from astrometry.net):
The image is still a bit noisy for my liking, but here's a few (approximately) 1:1 crops for flavor:
M60:
NGC 4298/NGC 4302
NGC 4222/ NGC 4216 / NGC 4206
Everything was done in AstroPixelProcessor, 400mm/2.8 Nikkor shot at f/4, Nikon D810 on Losmandy GM-8, 15 subs.
This panoramic assembly is about a 3 x 5 array of full-frame stacks I've generated since 2016, and a full size print at 200 dpi would be 8 feet on a side. At the center is Markarian's chain:
and in total there are easily several hundred galaxies in this image (from astrometry.net):
The image is still a bit noisy for my liking, but here's a few (approximately) 1:1 crops for flavor:
M60:
NGC 4298/NGC 4302
NGC 4222/ NGC 4216 / NGC 4206
Everything was done in AstroPixelProcessor, 400mm/2.8 Nikkor shot at f/4, Nikon D810 on Losmandy GM-8, 15 subs.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 22,399
- 7,253
June 17, 2024 - NASA rover discovers mysterious light-toned boulder "never observed before" on Mars
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mars-r...ers-mysterious-boulder-never-observed-before/
The mysterious boulder has been nicknamed Atoko Point, and a deeper examination of the rock using the rover's instruments suggested that it was composed of the minerals pyroxene and feldspar.
https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/mars-rover-discovers-a-strange-red-planet-rock/
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-perseverance-fords-an-ancient-river-to-reach-science-target
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mars-r...ers-mysterious-boulder-never-observed-before/
While exploring a crater on Mars that may give scientists insights into life that potentially once existed there, NASA said its Perseverance rover made an unprecedented discovery. The rover, which landed on the Red Planet in 2021 specifically to probe the ancient Jezero crater, found a mysterious light-toned boulder earlier this month that was the first of its kind seen on Martian land.
Perseverance encountered the boulder while traversing the Neretva Vallis, a dried river delta that flowed into the crater billions of years ago, on its way to an area inside the rim where rocky outcrops are being examined for sediment that could shed light on Mars' history, said NASA. The rover had changed course along its route to avoid rough terrain when, traveling a short cut through a dune field, it reached a hill that scientists have dubbed Mount Washburn.
The hill was covered with boulders, some of which NASA described as belonging to "a type never observed before on Mars."
One small boulder particularly intrigued the scientists working with Perseverance from Earth. Measuring roughly 18 inches across and 14 inches tall, the speckled and conspicuously light-toned rock was spotted among a field of darker boulders on the hill.
The mysterious boulder has been nicknamed Atoko Point, and a deeper examination of the rock using the rover's instruments suggested that it was composed of the minerals pyroxene and feldspar.
https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/mars-rover-discovers-a-strange-red-planet-rock/
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia26333-standing-out-on-mars-mount-washburnComposed of 18 images, this natural-color mosaic shows a boulder field on "Mount Washburn" (named after a mountain in Wyoming) in Mars' Jezero Crater. The Perseverance science team nicknamed the light-toned boulder with dark speckles near the center of the mosaic "Atoko Point" (after a feature in the eastern Grand Canyon). The images were acquired by NASA's Perseverance Mars rover on May 27, 2024, the 1,162nd Martian day, or sol, of the mission.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-perseverance-fords-an-ancient-river-to-reach-science-target
- 1,194
- 686
Spot the playful Delphinus (Dolphin)) constellation. Altair - in Aquila - is the bright star at lower left.
- 7,699
- 3,787
It took a little longer than I expected, but here's my final image of the region of sky surrounding gamma cygni:
The original is 14k x 12k pixels, good for a 30" x 40" print. Even downscaled, you can see the crescent nebula located near the center. Along the rough diagonal running lower left to upper right, there's NGC 6914, a reflection nebula:
running upwards along the diagonal are the butterfly nebula and NGC 6910 (the Rocking horse cluster) to NGC 6871 and all the way up to Sh2-101 (Tulip nebula) and NGC 6857:
(200% crop). Lastly, since this view is directly through the milky way, here's a couple of crops of dense star fields:
Deets: Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4, 15s exposures. All stacking/montage/post-processing in Astro Pixel Processor.
The original is 14k x 12k pixels, good for a 30" x 40" print. Even downscaled, you can see the crescent nebula located near the center. Along the rough diagonal running lower left to upper right, there's NGC 6914, a reflection nebula:
running upwards along the diagonal are the butterfly nebula and NGC 6910 (the Rocking horse cluster) to NGC 6871 and all the way up to Sh2-101 (Tulip nebula) and NGC 6857:
(200% crop). Lastly, since this view is directly through the milky way, here's a couple of crops of dense star fields:
Deets: Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4, 15s exposures. All stacking/montage/post-processing in Astro Pixel Processor.
- 7,699
- 3,787
This image is called "Lemonade" for reasons that will become clear:
So, we had a couple F1 tornadoes touch down here on Tuesday and I am currently without electrical power "until further notice". Last night was clear, and with widespread power outages, the sky was relatively dark. Woot!
But I need power for the tracking mount :(
But I can easily do 'star trails': I have a Vivitar 28/2.5 lens that I haven't played around with much so I gave it a spin and am very pleased with the result! Lots of airplanes are visible, and the bright thing in lower center is a firefly. Bright star on the right is Altair and top center is Vega.
Normally, I use my 15/2.8 lens for wide-angle photography, but if I used it here, most of the frame would be trees/houses. The Vivitar is significantly smaller and slightly faster, even though with a 1cm entrance pupil it's hardly a 'light bucket', and surprisingly easy to work with.
Deets: Nikon D810 + Vivitar 28/2.5 (shot at f/2.5), 30s subs until the my bedtime, no tracking. Post-processing was trivial: skip image registration and integrate based on 'maximum intensity'. Then a quick background subtraction in Fiji (20 pixel radius, no smoothing). The background subtraction kinda fails around the tree, but whatevs...
So, we had a couple F1 tornadoes touch down here on Tuesday and I am currently without electrical power "until further notice". Last night was clear, and with widespread power outages, the sky was relatively dark. Woot!
But I need power for the tracking mount :(
But I can easily do 'star trails': I have a Vivitar 28/2.5 lens that I haven't played around with much so I gave it a spin and am very pleased with the result! Lots of airplanes are visible, and the bright thing in lower center is a firefly. Bright star on the right is Altair and top center is Vega.
Normally, I use my 15/2.8 lens for wide-angle photography, but if I used it here, most of the frame would be trees/houses. The Vivitar is significantly smaller and slightly faster, even though with a 1cm entrance pupil it's hardly a 'light bucket', and surprisingly easy to work with.
Deets: Nikon D810 + Vivitar 28/2.5 (shot at f/2.5), 30s subs until the my bedtime, no tracking. Post-processing was trivial: skip image registration and integrate based on 'maximum intensity'. Then a quick background subtraction in Fiji (20 pixel radius, no smoothing). The background subtraction kinda fails around the tree, but whatevs...
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 3,443
- 3,414
The Croc's Eye Galaxy (a.k.a. M94, NGC 4736, Cat's Eye Galaxy) grabbed from my back patio, May-July 2024. M94 is a spiral galaxy in the constellation Canes Venatici. It has a couple of faint rings surrounding it, now believed to be a complex structure of faint, spiral arms.
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 455×40 sec = 5.06 hrs
R: 281×60 sec = 4.68 hrs
G: 245×60 sec = 4.08 hrs
B: 225×60 sec = 3.75 hrs
Hα: 24×600 sec = 4.00 hrs
Total integration time: 21.57 hours
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with
o RC-Astro Plugins
o SkyPixels "GAME" plugin
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 455×40 sec = 5.06 hrs
R: 281×60 sec = 4.68 hrs
G: 245×60 sec = 4.08 hrs
B: 225×60 sec = 3.75 hrs
Hα: 24×600 sec = 4.00 hrs
Total integration time: 21.57 hours
- 7,699
- 3,787
Region of the sky around NGC 6802 (and next to the 'coathangar cluster'):
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 105/1.4 shot @ f/2 mounted on Losmandy GM-8, 30s subs, 5.25h total integration. Stacking and post-processing in APP.
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 105/1.4 shot @ f/2 mounted on Losmandy GM-8, 30s subs, 5.25h total integration. Stacking and post-processing in APP.
Tom.G
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,661
- 4,504
Not terribly accurate, but how about an inverter to plug into your car?Andy Resnick said:But I need power for the tracking mount :(
I have a small one, 100W that plugs into the accessory socket for the light stuff, and a 1,000W for the Skil Saw. Since I don't have a basement for a workshop, that saves a Lot of clean-up!
The drawbacks for the 1kW inverter are you need really heavy jumper cables to power it, and at continuous use, you have to pause occassionally to get the battery recharged from the stock alternator.
Cheers,
Tom
- 7,699
- 3,787
Nah... don't feel like running my car for something like this. I used to have a battery to drive the mount, thinking it would make me more mobile, but since I never went anywhere it was quite literally another lead weight to drag around.Tom.G said:Not terribly accurate, but how about an inverter to plug into your car?
I have a small one, 100W that plugs into the accessory socket for the light stuff, and a 1,000W for the Skil Saw. Since I don't have a basement for a workshop, that saves a Lot of clean-up!
The drawbacks for the 1kW inverter are you need really heavy jumper cables to power it, and at continuous use, you have to pause occassionally to get the battery recharged from the stock alternator.
Cheers,
Tom
- 7,699
- 3,787
Saturn, in a photogenic inclination (and orientation):
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800mm @ f/8, 1/30s, ISO 200; 32 images stacked in APP.
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800mm @ f/8, 1/30s, ISO 200; 32 images stacked in APP.
pinball1970
Gold Member
- 3,564
- 5,612
Its green!Andy Resnick said:Saturn, in a photogenic inclination (and orientation):
View attachment 350229
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800mm @ f/8, 1/30s, ISO 200; 32 images stacked in APP.
Is that real or some atmospheric/ camera effect?
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 3,443
- 3,414
pinball1970 said:Its green!
Is that real or some atmospheric/ camera effect?
I'm going to venture a guess here without knowing the full story:
I'm guessing the video/images were taken with the Nikon's white balance set to "Auto." But since the camera was just pointing up at the darkness, for the most part, it's just white-balance metering on the noise. Perhaps since there are fewer red and blue pixels, compared to green, in the Bayer matrix, it means there is more noise (as in SNR) in the red and blue channels, resulting in the greenish hue, after the camera's automatic white-balance adjustment.
If my guess is right, the problem could have been alleviated somewhat by setting the white balance to "Daylight." But even then, Saturn would appear a bit yellow due to typical atmospheric scattering (same reason our Sun looks yellow).
Getting the color right invariably takes some adjustments in post processing no matter what you do.
[Edit: it's still a fine image and I appreciate it regardless of the color nuances.]
Last edited:
timmdeeg
Gold Member
- 1,547
- 343
Milky Way
Location: Astrofarm Kiripotib
Date: 09.16.2023
Camera: Sony A7III with Clip Filter
Lens 1.8 / 14 GM - focal length 14 mm
Frames: 15x25s - ISO 800
Software: Siril - Graxpert - LightZone
Location: Astrofarm Kiripotib
Date: 09.16.2023
Camera: Sony A7III with Clip Filter
Lens 1.8 / 14 GM - focal length 14 mm
Frames: 15x25s - ISO 800
Software: Siril - Graxpert - LightZone
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 3,443
- 3,414
The Lagoon Nebula (a.k.a., M8, NGC 6523) from my back patio, imaged from April-July, 2024.
M8 is about 4000-6000 light-years away from Earth. It is fairly large (angular wise) and bright, comparatively, but you'll need a telescope or binoculars to see it. You can find it in the constellation Sagittarius.
Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader 3.5/4nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera
It reminds me of Gilligan's Island.
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins
It's bigger than the lagoon on Gilligan's Island, of course.
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 1x1
Stacked using the drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 72×480s = 9.60 hrs
Hα: 77×480s = 10.27 hrs
Oiii: 81×480s = 10.80 hrs
Total integration time: 30.67 hours.
M8 is about 4000-6000 light-years away from Earth. It is fairly large (angular wise) and bright, comparatively, but you'll need a telescope or binoculars to see it. You can find it in the constellation Sagittarius.
Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader 3.5/4nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera
It reminds me of Gilligan's Island.
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins
It's bigger than the lagoon on Gilligan's Island, of course.
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 1x1
Stacked using the drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 72×480s = 9.60 hrs
Hα: 77×480s = 10.27 hrs
Oiii: 81×480s = 10.80 hrs
Total integration time: 30.67 hours.
- 7,699
- 3,787
If you say so- I can't tell :)pinball1970 said:Its green!
Is that real or some atmospheric/ camera effect?
Normally I use APP to auto- color correct (via star colors), but I skipped that step here and don't trust myself to do it manually. Honestly, I had no idea!
- 7,699
- 3,787
I set the camera WB to 'direct sunlight' b/c 'auto WB' would likely drift as the sky darkens and streetlights turn on, assuming it works at all under low light conditions.collinsmark said:I'm going to venture a guess here without knowing the full story:
I'm guessing the video/images were taken with the Nikon's white balance set to "Auto." But since the camera was just pointing up at the darkness, for the most part, it's just white-balance metering on the noise. Perhaps since there are fewer red and blue pixels, compared to green, in the Bayer matrix, it means there is more noise (as in SNR) in the red and blue channels, resulting in the greenish hue, after the camera's automatic white-balance adjustment.
If my guess is right, the problem could have been alleviated somewhat by setting the white balance to "Daylight." But even then, Saturn would appear a bit yellow due to typical atmospheric scattering (same reason our Sun looks yellow).
Getting the color right invariably takes some adjustments in post processing no matter what you do.
[Edit: it's still a fine image and I appreciate it regardless of the color nuances.]
But yeah- color correction is tricky, especially since I don't trust my eyes. :)
Edit: actually, upon reflection, I think the problem was focus error. Longitudinal chromatic aberration (sometimes called 'purple fringing') is the likely culprit for the green tint.
Last edited:
- 7,699
- 3,787
Heh- no sooner had I completed an analysis of my imaging system when I enjoyed 10 clear nights over 2 weeks, a rarity. Using my conclusions, I put together a 2 x 3 panorama centered on the North America Nebula:
(obviously this is downscaled, the original is 11k x 9.7k pixels).
This only took 2 weeks! Had I been using my (now prior) settings, this would have taken 2 *years* to put together. Really happy I can make out IC 5068. Deneb is the super-bright star.
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4. 13s subs ISO 200. Losmandy GM-8 mount, all stacking and post-processing done in APP.
(obviously this is downscaled, the original is 11k x 9.7k pixels).
This only took 2 weeks! Had I been using my (now prior) settings, this would have taken 2 *years* to put together. Really happy I can make out IC 5068. Deneb is the super-bright star.
Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4. 13s subs ISO 200. Losmandy GM-8 mount, all stacking and post-processing done in APP.
- 7,699
- 3,787
This entire past week was clear skies- unheard of! Stephan's quintet is in a good viewing location, so I had another chance to check my model predictions, this time at 800mm focal length.
Here's the whole field of view:
(Nikon D810+ Nikkor 800/5.6 @ f/8, Losmandy GM-8 mount, 8s subs, ISO 200, 9.3 hours integration time, stacking in APP)
The smudge is NGC 7331. Stephan's quintet is in the center, barely resolvable at this focal length, shown here at 250%:
Serious imaging of this object requires significantly longer focal lengths than I have access to. But in terms of brightness, my model predicted the results pretty well- the model predicts that I am barely able to detect magnitude 18 stars. Zooming into the group of stars in the lower left:
According to the SIMBAD catalog, the brightest star on the left is (apparent) magnitude 13.0 and the nearby second-brightest is magnitude 15.2. Comparing the brightness values in the image, I extrapolate the third bright star (upper right) as magnitude 17, and the three faint dots decorating the brighter stars are extrapolated to about magnitude 18.
Here's the whole field of view:
(Nikon D810+ Nikkor 800/5.6 @ f/8, Losmandy GM-8 mount, 8s subs, ISO 200, 9.3 hours integration time, stacking in APP)
The smudge is NGC 7331. Stephan's quintet is in the center, barely resolvable at this focal length, shown here at 250%:
Serious imaging of this object requires significantly longer focal lengths than I have access to. But in terms of brightness, my model predicted the results pretty well- the model predicts that I am barely able to detect magnitude 18 stars. Zooming into the group of stars in the lower left:
According to the SIMBAD catalog, the brightest star on the left is (apparent) magnitude 13.0 and the nearby second-brightest is magnitude 15.2. Comparing the brightness values in the image, I extrapolate the third bright star (upper right) as magnitude 17, and the three faint dots decorating the brighter stars are extrapolated to about magnitude 18.
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 3,443
- 3,414
The Trifid Nebula (a.k.a. M20, NGC 6514) captured from my back patio, April-July 2024. M20 is approximately 4100 light-years away and can be found (looking from Earth) in the constellation Sagittarius. It's a comparatively bright emission nebula. Its declination is -23 degrees, making it a fairly easy target if you live in the Southern hemisphere. Although if you live in the Northern hemisphere (like me), it's still visible so long as a you have a good view to the South (although you may need binoculars or a telescope).
If you notice any diffraction spikes in my image, they're not from spider vanes in my telescope, but rather from the corner of my storage shed that the Trifid Nebula drifted behind each night.
This image is "first light" for the Antila SII (sulphur-II) and Oiii (oxygen-III) filters that I installed several months ago.
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Antlia 3nm Narrowband (SII, Hα, Oiii) filter set
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro Plugins
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 83×600 sec = 13.83 hrs
Hα: 82×600 sec = 13.67 hrs
Oiii: 88×600 sec = 14.67 hrs
Total integration time: 42.17 hours
.
If you notice any diffraction spikes in my image, they're not from spider vanes in my telescope, but rather from the corner of my storage shed that the Trifid Nebula drifted behind each night.
This image is "first light" for the Antila SII (sulphur-II) and Oiii (oxygen-III) filters that I installed several months ago.
Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Antlia 3nm Narrowband (SII, Hα, Oiii) filter set
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera
Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro Plugins
Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 83×600 sec = 13.83 hrs
Hα: 82×600 sec = 13.67 hrs
Oiii: 88×600 sec = 14.67 hrs
Total integration time: 42.17 hours
.
Last edited:
bruha
- 389
- 513
Hello, I attach Saturn, Jupiter and Sunspots (with green filter-unfortunately I have defected lens of mobile camera
) Saturn was in opposition last weekend and rings plane was directed to earth as seen...}..
(little Gimp corrected)
Lot of succes.....




(little Gimp corrected)
Lot of succes.....
Attachments
Similar threads
- · Replies 23 ·
- Replies
- 23
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 12 ·
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 24 ·
- Replies
- 24
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 13 ·
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 4 ·
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 9 ·
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 11 ·
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 10 ·
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 30 ·
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 4K