Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on sharing the beauty of the Universe through photos, videos, and animations, emphasizing the aesthetic appeal of space alongside scientific information. Participants are encouraged to post clips and images that comply with mainstream scientific guidelines, avoiding fringe theories. Notable contributions include time-lapse videos from the ISS and clips related to NASA missions, such as the Dawn and New Horizons projects. The thread also highlights the emotional impact of experiencing the vastness of space through visual media. Overall, it celebrates the intersection of art and science in showcasing the wonders of the Universe.
  • #2,251
SH2-125, "Cocoon Nebula", IC 5146, Caldwell 19, Barnard 168... lots of names for the same object:

Sh2-125-crop-lpc-cbg-St-35142s-1.jpg


Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4, Losmandy GM8 mount. 10s subs, 10 hours total integration, image stacking with APP. A 1:1 crop:

Clipboard.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg, DennisN, collinsmark and 3 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2,252
Hello, here is my Saturn image with better resolution.. :wideeyed: :smile:

Saturn opposition.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes DennisN, davenn, Astronuc and 2 others
  • #2,253
Upcoming event - Watch a partial lunar eclipse during Tuesday’s Super Moon (Harvest Moon) and Saturn.
https://www.astronomy.com/observing/how-to-watch-a-partial-lunar-eclipse-during-tuesdays-super-moon/
Additionally, if you’re up early and ready to pregame on Tuesday morning, the Moon passes in front of the planet Saturn in the pre-dawn sky for those in the western half of the U.S. (including Hawaii) and Canada. All other observers will still see the two objects hanging close together in the early-morning twilight.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DennisN, Stavros Kiri, Ibix and 1 other person
  • #2,254
SH 2-92 (LBN 145) imaged from my back patio, June-August 2024. SH 2-92 is an emission nebula that can be found (as seen from Earth) in the constellation Vulpecula, near the border of Cygnus. It's an HII region ionized by the Wolf-Rayet star, WR 127.

SH2_92_2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


While it's not an extremely challenging/dim nebula, it's not particularly bright either. I wouldn't bother trying to observe this target visually, even with a telescope or binoculars.

It's also right up against one of the arms of our Milky Way galaxy, so there's a plethora of background stars, all around. What at first appears to be noise is really just stars and stars galore. I did my best in post processing to implement some star reduction techniques to enhance the nebulosity.

To me, SH 2-92 looks like a phoenix or maybe a depiction of a winged person you might find on a trophy top.

Others have affectionately named it "The Scream" based on the famous painting by Edvard Munch (this hasn't totally caught on yet). I suppose that works too. To see the similarity, imagine the dust lane in the lower-right is the person's mouth, and then mentally picture the hands to the sides of a face.

Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader 3.5/4nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 1x1
Stacked using the drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 102×480s = 13.60 hrs
Hα: 81×480s = 10.80 hrs
Oiii: 93×480s = 12.40 hrs
Total integration time: 36.80 hours.
.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes timmdeeg, davenn, DennisN and 6 others
  • #2,255
NGC 188, imaged over 2 nights (total integration time 4 hours):

NGC_188-St-14440s copy.jpg

Deets: Nikon D810 + Nikkor 800/5.6 (shot @ f/8), Losmandy GM-8 mount, stacking in APP.

NGC 188 is abnormally old.

NGC 188 is very close to Polaris so tracking errors are minimized- I was able to keep 90% of the 20s subs resulting in an efficiency rating of 75%, which is great. I didn't perform any alignment procedures (other than visually sighting Polaris/2nd star), so I probably could have shot 30s subs with some alignment corrections.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, bruha and collinsmark
  • #2,256
Hi,
here is Venus by Sunset (Kefalonia Island september) :smile: :wink:

IMG_2290U.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, pinball1970, Stavros Kiri and 2 others
  • #2,257
Some Aurora in the North West of the UK

c/o astranut


1728656173710.png


1728656209893.png


and my work colleague Katie


1728656267890.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes timmdeeg, davenn, Astranut and 3 others
  • #2,258
Saturn and several of its moons last Thursday night.
To the left is Dione.
The bright one to the upper right is Titan.
Below Titan is Tethys.
Mimas and Hyperion are also in the picture but are too dim to make out.

Saturn_2024_10_11_0618_3_Final_ForPF.jpg


'Not my best image of Saturn; I had issues.

I won't complain about San Diego's entire month of night-haze/fog, since it's trivial compared to the devastation in other parts of the country here. But it did keep me from getting an image closer to Saturn's opposition in September.

This is my first planetary image with the new telescope setup. There's still a few kinks that need to be worked out. I did not use the atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC), nor a barlow/Powermate for this one. I need to make a few tweaks to the mount's control interface before I attempt that. I'm still learning/experimenting.

Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
ZWO ASI585MC camera

Software:
FireCapture
AutoStakkert! 4
PixInsight
WinJUPOS

Acquisition/Processing:
Location: San Diego, CA, USA.
Atmospheric Seeing: Slightly on the sad side of "meh."
Midpoint timestamp: 2024-10-11 06:18.3 UTC.
Several hours worth of 1-minute videos were captured with FireCapture.
Nine contiguous 1-minute videos were selected.
Each video processed with AutoStakkert!
Each of the 9 images sharpened and processed in PixInsight.
Each of the sharpened images derotated and combined in WinJUPOS.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg, davenn and 5 others
  • #2,259
Saturn seems rather oblate. Optical illusion from the rings or are the poles dark in this picture.

Clearly Saturn needs more moons too!
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #2,260
Has anyone seen Comet C/2023 A3 Tsuchinshan-ATLAS? I think I saw it tonight. This was about 8 pm. Note the smudge above the sign on the fence. Venus is at far left, and Arcturus is at top right. There was some light haze near the horizon. I'll try again in another day or two, when I might get a clearer view.

IMG_0694.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, collinsmark, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #2,261
A clear moonless week of nights, so I continued to image Sh2-125 (Cocoon Nebula):

Sh2-125-St-72002s-1.jpg


Nikon D810 + Nikkor 400/2.8 @ f/4 mounted on Losmandy GM-8. 10s subs, 20 h total integration time. A 1:1 crop:

Untitled.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, timmdeeg, davenn and 3 others
  • #2,262
Quick stack and edit of comet C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) shot using a simple tripod from earlier tonight (CET). 11 individual 6s exposures with 70 mm focal length (Canon 70-200mm F4L @ F/5.6 and a Canon 5D mk III @ ISO 6400). Note the faint anti-tail and globular cluster Messier 5 (fuzzy spot just left of 12 O'clock from the comet nucleus)

Not sure why some bright stars are square, must be a DSS stacking artifact, haven't used it in a while. Weather looks good tomorrow as well, will go back with a wider lens.

The comet was pretty nice naked eye and gorgeous in 7x50 mm binos.
C2023 A3 (quick stack and edit).jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, AlexB23, timmdeeg and 3 others
  • #2,263
collinsmark said:
Not my best image of Saturn
Nevertheless. it is excellent.

Is the scope too big for Jupiter? If that's Saturn, Jupiter must be enormous and bright.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, AlexB23 and collinsmark
  • #2,264
Vanadium 50 said:
Nevertheless. it is excellent.

Is the scope too big for Jupiter? If that's Saturn, Jupiter must be enormous and bright.

Nah, the scope is the right size. The Saturn picture is actually a pretty heavy crop from a very small sensor -- yet still a heavy crop. I could have done better by using a 2x Barlow lens (increases the focal length by 2X). 'Same goes for Jupiter. A 2X Barlow lens, for an effective f/ ratio of around f/22 will help improve image quality.

One of the challenges of planetary (as in planetary astrophotography) is just getting the target into the field of view in the first place. If the telescope's pointing is not perfectly centered (it never is), you just see nothing. A whole bunch of nothing. Plate solving is useless, since it's way too "zoomed in" for that. It's just a whole bunch of nothing.

And a 2X Barlow makes finding the target 4X as difficult, since there's only 1/4 the field of view area compared to no Barlow.

There are some tricks to use to get the target in the field of view. I won't discuss those here: that's a whole post on its own. But there are ways to get the planet to line up with the camera's small sensor.

The problem I was having is that when my laptop is connected to the telescope mount, and then use the telescope's hand-controller to slew, to get the planet roughly centered in the finderscope, the mount automatically disables its tracking. Like, WTH, man?! It made everything vastly more difficult.

So, as a potential solution, I've got a game controller coming in the mail -- the same sort of game controller you use to play on game-consoles -- to control the mount through the laptop software. That way I don't even have to touch the mount's hand-controller. That way I can do everything through the software running on the laptop.

I'll try that next time.
 
  • Like
Likes AlexB23, Ibix and Vanadium 50
  • #2,265
Hi, here is not quite succesfull atempt of Tsuchinshan-ATLAS from 20.october-Bohmerwald CZ-cca 250x magnificied (direction by telescope is of course opposite- to up)-probably not quite good light condition and equipment as well... :wideeyed::H

IMG_2407U.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, pinball1970, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #2,266
Hi, here some results of my recent trip to Namibia.

Telescope: Lacerta 8" Fotonewton on mount EQ6-R PRO
Camera: Sony A7III modified
Software: Siril/Starnet - Fitswork - LightZone
Location: Astrofarm Kiripotib - Namibia
Date: Sept. 2024

NGC 1316 accompanied by NGC 1326 - Distance 70 Mill Lj.
Frames: 92x300 - ISO 400
Integration: 7h 40'
Field radius 1,2°
1730016691703.jpeg



NGC 5128, Centaurus A - Distance 17 Mill Lj
Frames: 46x300 - ISO 400
Integration: 3h 50'
Field radius 0,75°
1730016777196.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes Astranut, Tom.G, Stavros Kiri and 4 others
  • #2,267
excellent!
👍 👍:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, DennisN, pinball1970 and 1 other person
  • #2,268
Ghost Nebula* (Sh2-136) haunted from my back Patio, June-August 2024. The nebula can be found in the northern constellation Cepheus.

*(Not to be confused with Ghost of Cassiopeia [IC 63]; that's a different nebula.)

Ghost2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


I've been saving this one for the right time. Happy Halloween!

The Ghost Nebula is one of my favorite reflection nebulae, not just because it's intriguing and spooky, but because it reminds me of the treasured Glueslug.

Several decades ago, back in college, one of my friends acquired a Glueslug toy. It's this semi-translucent, rubbery slug-shaped thing about the size of a small bread roll (don't eat it though). You could toss it up to the ceiling, directly above the sofa or comfy-chair, and it would stay there, stuck to the ceiling for hours. Then later when some unsuspecting soul went into the living room to watch Ren and Stimpy or to study, the Glueslug would fall onto their lap or head. Oh, what fun we had.

Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro Plugins

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 693×40 sec = 7.70 hrs
R: 672×60 sec = 11.20 hrs
G: 784×60 sec = 13.07 hrs
B: 690×60 sec = 11.50 hrs
Total integration time: 43.47 hours

=================
If I'm not mistaken, here is what the Glueslug looked like:
tumblr_pp3pg2bPzl1tltcnj_1280.jpg

tumblr_pp3pg1Lska1tltcnj_500.jpg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, Stavros Kiri, timmdeeg and 2 others
  • #2,269
Borg said:
Coming soon to a galaxy near you - T Coronae Borealis Nova.

I do a 2-hour walk every day - usually at night. And (weather permitting, of course) I have been keeping an eye on Coronae Borealis. Except for the fact that is has worked its way to the western horizon as the Sun prepares to transit that part of the sky, nothing has happened.

So, could we reschedule this for next year - and since I am more likely to be walking outdoors in the evening (as opposed to the morning) could we make it for mid-summer to mid-fall?

Thanks,
Scott
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and DennisN
  • #2,270
More on T Coronae Borealis Nova:
I just ran into this IFL Science article published a month ago. It echoes some of what I said in my last post.

There's a good reason why they bemoaned tardiness of the T CrB show a month before I did. T CrB is at a declination of 25.9N and I am at 42.7N - north of all major Earth-bound observatories. So while I'm just loosing my view now - most Blaze-Gazers lost it weeks ago.

But there is one hopeful point that that article made - the widely announced Blaze time window was never that certain. It was a prediction by a Prof Bradley Schaefer, and it was not a simple linear extrapolation from earlier observations.

This paper documents those observations:
T Coronae Borealis was discovered to have risen from magnitude 9.8 to 3.0 on February 9, 1946, by Norman F. H. Wright, of Bedford Park, England, and by Armin J. Deutsch, at the Yerkes Observatory, 3 months less than 80 years after J. Birmingham had discovered a similar rise to magnitude 2 on May 12, 1866. It is, therefore, without question, a recurrent nova.
So using a strictly linear extrapolation, we would put the Blaze at early November, 2025. Not that I'm trying to make any prediction. But this "November 2025" value suggests that Schaefer's predictions were based on wrong assumptions - and the nature of those assumptions (for example, trying to use the possible 1787 observation) are likely to be not just imprecise but inaccurate.

So, we aren't dealing with a bell curve with the center somewhere in September 2024, and the good observation opportunities of Summer and Fall 2025 several standard deviations less likely that this Winter.

And it is certainly not beyond hope that the Blaze will wait for better times.
 
  • #2,271
M27CA.jpg


Mentor's Note: Post merged into this thread.
Taken with my Seestar S50 44 minutes processed and cropped in GIMP
 

Attachments

  • 1714978703007.jpg
    1714978703007.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #2,272
Hello, I add atempts of Saturn, Jupiter and Trapezium (Orion nebula centre) from Saturday -Bohmerwald.
Images are little highlighted (sharpened) by Gimp and made by eyepiece camera Toupsky with newton scope 1000x200 mm. :wideeyed: :wideeyed::smile: Lot of succes....
 

Attachments

  • T2U.jpg
    T2U.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 58
  • Jup.jpg
    Jup.jpg
    1.9 KB · Views: 40
  • sat.jpg
    sat.jpg
    1.2 KB · Views: 53
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, pinball1970 and collinsmark
  • #2,273
Eastern Veil Nebula (Caldwell 34), pulled from my back patio, Aug-Sept 2024. If you ignore the "tail" and concentrate on the "Head" of the Eastern Veil Nebula, that smaller section is sometimes called the "Bat Nebula"* (NGC 6995; upper, and slightly to the left in the image). I posted an image of the Bat Nebula a couple of years ago using a different setup. The image here is a larger field of view showing the whole Eastern Veil Nebula.

*(Not to be confused with the Flying Bat Nebula [Sh 2-129] or the Cosmic Bat Nebula [LDN 43]. Those are different nebulae.)

The Eastern Veil Nebula is part of an even larger structure (not shown in its entirety in the image) called The Cygnus Loop (Sharpless 103).

EasternVeil2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader 3.5/4nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 1x1
Stacked using the drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 80×480s = 10.67 hrs
Hα: 91×480s = 12.13 hrs
Oiii: 87×480s = 11.60 hrs
Total integration time: 34.40 hours.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes Stavros Kiri, Drakkith, timmdeeg and 2 others
  • #2,274
Hello, here is still another Jupiter and Saturn version (little better-Jupiter probably me best up to now. :wideeyed: :confused:)
Lot of Success and have no light pollution👍👍
 

Attachments

  • s27UU.jpg
    s27UU.jpg
    1.1 KB · Views: 41
  • J10UU.jpg
    J10UU.jpg
    1.9 KB · Views: 46
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and Drakkith
  • #2,275
Since it's going to be cloudy for another week or so, I'll go ahead and post results of imaging M31 at either 400mm or 800mm focal length:

M31-St-77352s_400mm.jpg


Nikon D810 + nikkor 400/2.8 (shot at f/4), mounted on Losmandy GM-8. 10s subs, 21.5 hours total integration time, stacking and post process in Astro Pixel Processor

M31-St-63148s.jpg


Nikon D810 + nikkor 400/2.8 (shot at f/4) + 2x tele , mounted on Losmandy GM-8. 10s subs, 17.5 hours total integration time, stacking and post process in Astro Pixel Processor.

I wanted to try this comparison b/c at 800mm, M31 just barely fits in the field of view, meaning that I have to work harder to correct the image corner-to-corner rather than just crop. Also, imaging at f/4 captures a lot more light than at f/8, so accumulating enough signal for a decent SNR requires less time.

Other than differences in color and field of view, it's hard to tell if there are substantive differences at this scale. It's much more obvious at 1:1, which I'll accentuate even more by posting a field of view with a double star at 2:1 (800mm) and 4:1 (400mm):

400mm:
Untitled 2.jpg


and 800mm:
Untitled.jpg


The differences in image sharpness are (IMO) primarily due to seeing effects; under conditions of 'diffraction-limited imaging' the images should look much more similar.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, Bystander, timmdeeg and 4 others
  • #2,276
collinsmark said:
Eastern Veil Nebula (Caldwell 34), pulled from my back patio, Aug-Sept 2024. If you ignore the "tail" and concentrate on the "Head" of the Eastern Veil Nebula, that smaller section is sometimes called the "Bat Nebula"* (NGC 6995; upper, and slightly to the left in the image). I posted an image of the Bat Nebula a couple of years ago using a different setup. The image here is a larger field of view showing the whole Eastern Veil Nebula.

*(Not to be confused with the Flying Bat Nebula [Sh 2-129] or the Cosmic Bat Nebula [LDN 43]. Those are different nebulae.)

The Eastern Veil Nebula is part of an even larger structure (not shown in its entirety in the image) called The Cygnus Loop (Sharpless 103).

View attachment 353349

Equipment:
Explore Scientific 80ED-FCD100
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Orion Field Flattener for Short Refractors
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader 3.5/4nm Ultra-Narrowband filter set
ZWO ASI2600MM-Pro main camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro plugins

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 1x1
Stacked using the drizzle algorithm
SHO mapping
SII: 80×480s = 10.67 hrs
Hα: 91×480s = 12.13 hrs
Oiii: 87×480s = 11.60 hrs
Total integration time: 34.40 hours.
Your Eastern Veil nebula with such rich details and faint nebula outside is really amazing! It's long exposure but its surprising that this is possible at all with bortle class 7/8.

Here for comparison the Eastern Veil nebula with total integration time 1h 27'. There are not even traces of such faint details your image shows.

SQM 20, bortle class 4/5
1731513234873.jpeg

Date: Sept. 2022
Location: Wachenheim an der Weinstraße, Germany
TS-Optics UNC 200 mm f/4 Newton-Teleskop
Skywatcher HEQ-5 Pro SynScan GoTo
Guiding: StarAid Revolution B
Kamera: Sony A7III modifiziert
GPU 2" Newton Koma Korrektor
Filter: Optolong L-Enhance
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, Stavros Kiri, davenn and 1 other person
  • #2,277
timmdeeg said:
Your Eastern Veil nebula with such rich details and faint nebula outside is really amazing! It's long exposure but its surprising that this is possible at all with bortle class 7/8.

Here for comparison the Eastern Veil nebula with total integration time 1h 27'. There are not even traces of such faint details your image shows.

SQM 20, bortle class 4/5
View attachment 353456
Date: Sept. 2022
Location: Wachenheim an der Weinstraße, Germany
TS-Optics UNC 200 mm f/4 Newton-Teleskop
Skywatcher HEQ-5 Pro SynScan GoTo
Guiding: StarAid Revolution B
Kamera: Sony A7III modifiziert
GPU 2" Newton Koma Korrektor
Filter: Optolong L-Enhance

Thanks! Your image is great too! :smile:

My image was shot using narrowband filters and a monochrome camera. The mount (Sky Watcher EQ6-R Pro) is quite stable with excellent tracking, and the guiding was done using an off-axis guider (good resolution in guiding, and minimal differential flexture between the main camera and guide camera).

The use of narrowband filters (with the monochrome camera) is the real key here. As long as the tracking and guiding are sufficient to allow exposures that are long enough to reduce the impact of read noise, the resulting signal to noise ratio can be quite impressive, even in moderately light-polluted locations. [Edit: and further increases to the S/N can be obtained @ Central Limit Theorem, with the 30 hours of integration.]
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri and timmdeeg
  • #2,278
Thanks for your explanation! I started Astrofotografie 2 1/2 years ago and learning seems never ending.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri
  • #2,279
Hercules Galaxy Cluster* (Abell 2151) captured from my back patio, April-Sept, 2024. The cluster can be observed in the constellation Hercules (hence its name).

*(Not to be confused with The Great Globular Cluster in Hercules [M13], that's a different cluster. And also that's a completely different type of cluster altogether. Both can be seen in the constellation Hercules, though.)

HerculesCluster2024_Final_SmallForPF.jpg


Most of the sharp, bright dots are stars are within our own Milky Way galaxy. The objects behind those stars -- the fuzzy blobs, spirals, and weird shapes -- are actually whole galaxies that lie hundreds of millions of light-years away.

Equipment:
Celestron C14 EdgeHD telescope
SkyWatcher EQ8-R Pro mount
Celestron 0.7x Focal reducer (for C14 EdgeHD)
Off-axis guider (OAG) with guide camera
Baader LRGB filter set
Antlia Hα filter
ZWO ASI6200MM-Pro Main Camera

Software:
N.I.N.A.
PHD2 Guiding
PixInsight with RC-Astro Plugins

Acquisition/Integration:
Location: San Diego, USA
Bortle Class 7 (maybe 8 ) skies
All subframes binned 2×2
Stacked using drizzle algorithm
L: 580×60 sec = 9.33 hrs
R: 135×60 sec + 87x120 sec = 5.15 hrs
G: 172×120 sec = 5.73 hrs
B: 169×120 sec = 5.63 hrs
Hα: 84×600 sec = 14.00 hrs
Total integration time: 39.85 hours
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Stavros Kiri, davenn and 2 others
  • #2,280
An article on Blaze start T Crb: Space.com
In a nut shell: Any month now - no telling when.
 
  • Like
Likes Stavros Kiri, Tom.G, Drakkith and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K