OUT Hyperbolic Motions | 65 Characters

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Altabeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
Altabeh
Messages
657
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody

I've been lately a little bit concerned over the hyperbolic motions that have the following equations in (ct,x)-space:

[tex]\frac{x^2}{(c^2/a)^2}-\frac{(ct)^2}{(c^2/a)^2}=1[/tex].

We know that events horizons are the lines that form a 45-degree angle by both ct- and x-axis. So what does actually assure us that here, for instance, for t=0, [tex]x=\pm c^2/a[/tex] lie inside events horizens? Is this just because [tex]a[/tex] can't in magnitude gets higher than [tex]c[/tex]?

AB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Altabeh said:
Hi everybody

I've been lately a little bit concerned over the hyperbolic motions that have the following equations in (ct,x)-space:

[tex]\frac{x^2}{(c^2/a)^2}-\frac{(ct)^2}{(c^2/a)^2}=1[/tex].

We know that events horizons are the lines that form a 45-degree angle by both ct- and x-axis. So what does actually assure us that here, for instance, for t=0, [tex]x=\pm c^2/a[/tex] lie inside events horizens? Is this just because [tex]a[/tex] can't in magnitude gets higher than [tex]c[/tex]?

AB

No.

[tex]x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,[/tex]

so [itex]a \rightarrow \infty[/itex] gives the horizons. For [itex]t=0[/itex], any value of [itex]x[/itex] except [itex]x = 0[/itex] lies inside the horizons.
 
George Jones said:
No.

[tex]x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,[/tex]

so [itex]a \rightarrow \infty[/itex] gives the horizons. For [itex]t=0[/itex], any value of [itex]x[/itex] except [itex]x = 0[/itex] lies inside the horizons.

Yeah, I got it!

Thanks
 
Also, differentiating

[tex]x^2 - \left(ct\right)^2 = \left( \frac{c^2}{a} \right)^2,[/tex]

gives

[tex]\frac{dx}{dt} = c \frac{ct}{x}.[/itex]<br /> <br /> Consequently,<br /> <br /> [tex]-c < \frac{dx}{dt} < c[/tex]<br /> <br /> gives that [itex]\left(ct , x \right)[/itex] lies inside the horizons.[/tex]
 
George Jones said:
Consequently,

[tex]-c < \frac{dx}{dt} < c[/tex]

gives that [itex]\left(ct , x \right)[/itex] lies inside the horizons.

Could you explain this a little bit more?
 
Altabeh said:
Could you explain this a little bit more?
Combine the following and what do you get?
George Jones said:
[tex]\frac{dx}{dt} = c \frac{ct}{x}.[/tex]
[tex]-c < \frac{dx}{dt} < c[/tex]