Overall Power Factor of three motors for transformer voltage drop calculation

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the overall power factor at the transformer secondary for three motors connected to a single busbar, one cannot simply average the individual power factors. Instead, the current for each motor should be converted into rectangular form, combining real and reactive components before summing them. The total current is then calculated, and the overall power factor is derived from the resulting angle. The calculations provided show a close agreement between the total current derived from both the rectangular method and simple addition, highlighting the importance of considering phase differences. This method effectively demonstrates the relationship between individual motor loads and the overall system performance.
Physicist3
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi

Suppose I have three motors connected to a single busbar which is fed by a single transformer and suppose that the current into the busbar (i.e. the total current of the transformer secondary) is known. If I wish to calculate the transformer voltage drop the I will obviously need the load power factor. If the power factors of each of the motors is known, can the powerfactor at the transformer secondary (i.e. the overall load powerfactor) be obtained by taking the average of the three motors.

E.g. if Motor A is assumed to have PF of 0.88, Motor B PF = 0.86 & Motor C PF = 0.84, is PF at busbar 0.86?

Many Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No.
The whole is equal to the sum of its parts not the average of its parts.

Make each motor current into rectangular form, real amps +jreactive amps ,

and add 'em up.

If this is a homework problem,
teacher probably wants you to solve some simultaneous equations to arrive at the answer.
Use phasors to make it a geometry problem that you can visualize

given only total current and power factor
you can draw a right triangle whose hypotenuse is total current and other two sides are real and imaginary amps.
what three smaller right triangles will add to give that one?

I think that'll work though haven't tried it myself.
Keep us posted?

old jim
 
Hi jim, many thanks for the reply and your advice :).

Considering the following theoretical example, and based upon what you have said, does this look about right:

Motor A: Drawing 55A, PF = 0.88
Motor B: Drawing 62A, PF = 0.79
Motor C: Drawing 87A, PF = 0.82

Motor A:

Φ = cos-1(0.88) = 28.36°

Real current component = I * PF = 55*0.88 = 48.4A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 55*Sin(28.36) = 26.13A

Motor A Current is therefore 48.40 + j26.13A

Motor B:

Φ = cos-1(0.79) = 37.81°

Real current component = I * PF = 62*0.79 = 48.98A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 62*Sin(37.81) = 38.01A

Motor B Current is therefore 48.98 + j38.01A

Motor C:

Φ = cos-1(0.82) = 34.92°

Real current component = I * PF = 87*0.82 = 71.34A
Imaginary Current component = I * Sin(Φ) = 87*Sin(34.92) = 49.80A

Motor C Current is therefore 71.34 + j49.80A

Total Current

Total current = A+B+C = 48.40+j26.13 + 48.98+j38.01 + 71.34+j49.80 = 168.72+j113.94

Total Current = √(168.722+113.942) = 203.59A

Φ = tan-1(113.94/168.72) = 34.03°

Overall PF of three motor loads = cos(34.03) = 0.829

I hop this is correct as when I calculate the total current using KCL (current into busbar = current leaving busbar etc.) I get the following;

I = 55+62+87 = 204A

which is very close to the total value obtained using real and reactive component method for each motor?

Many Thanks in advance
 
Your method looks perfect
and your orderly presentation is a delight to see.
Please excuse me for not checking the arithmetic in your polar to rectangular conversions , i know you are plenty capable
and i can hardly see the numbers on my slide rule anymore...

That your total current comes out 203.59
versus 204 from just adding them without adjusting for their slightly different phase
is such a small difference that it comes as a bit of a surprise . It would be hard to discern that little bit of difference on my 6" slide rule.

still, that they differ makes the point.
I guess this wasn't homework - surely a textbook author would have chosen currents that made the point more emphatically ?
If you are curious make one motor have a leading PF (synchronous motor can do that)
and see what it does to result

Basic rule of thumb : Add in rectangular co-ordinates, multiply in polar.

Congratulations ! You done good ! I have vicariously enjoyed your success.
and it is really heartwarming to see such orderly work.
Nice job. I bet it felt good.old jim
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top