Interacting Plasmas: The Possibility of Field Emission and Entanglement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Intuitive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plasma
Intuitive
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
If we have two Plasmas, One Positive and one Negative.
Both Plasmas are Hydrogen based, One Electricaly Charged (Neg) and the other stripped of it's Electrons (Pos).
The Positive Plasma is contained in an ideal insulated Box #1.
The Negative Plasma is also contained in an ideal insulated Box #2.

The ideal Boxes are ideally 0 conductive.

both Boxes #1. and #2. containing both type of Plasmas are separated by a vacuum
of 1mm, ideally, the Boxes are never in contact with each other at any time.

The Question is, Will the Plasmas interact with each other at any level through field emission and or any type of entanglement?:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intuitive said:
If we have two Plasmas, One Positive and one Negative.
Both Plasmas are Hydrogen based, One Electricaly Charged (Neg) and the other stripped of it's Electrons (Pos).
The Positive Plasma is contained in an ideal insulated Box #1.
The Negative Plasma is also contained in an ideal insulated Box #2.

The ideal Boxes are ideally 0 conductive.

both Boxes #1. and #2. containing both type of Plasmas are separated by a vacuum
of 1mm, ideally, the Boxes are never in contact with each other at any time.

The Question is, Will the Plasmas interact with each other at any level through field emission and or any type of entanglement?:smile:

Presumably they would interact electrically (elctromagnetically) by virtue of the difference in potential and the established electric field. The negative charge in matter is carried by the electrons, and the positive change on the nucleus (or + ion). In a plasma, completely ionized, a negative charge implies an excess of free electrons, and a postive charge a deficiency of electrons, and in reality, that is not a very stable system. The electrons would try to diffuse from one vessel (with excess e's) to the other.

Problem would seem to be much like that of a capacitor with an applied potential difference.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top