Undergrad Page 183-184 of Howard George's group book

Click For Summary
Section 12.3 of Howard George's book illustrates the decomposition of $SU(3)$ into $SU(2) \times U(1)$. The notation used includes representations denoted by boxes, where the dot signifies the trivial representation and the numbers indicate the hypercharge $(2I+1)_Y$. The discussion highlights that two boxes in the same row correspond to a $6$ representation of $SU(3)$, while further examples elaborate on this decomposition. Key questions raised include the meaning of the notation and the rules governing the decomposition, particularly in relation to Young tableaux. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping how $SU(3)$ relates to $SU(2) \times U(1)$.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
TL;DR
..
I would appreciate if someone could help me to understand what is happening in section 12.3 from the Howard George's book.

First of all, the propose of the section is to show how $SU(3)$ decomposes into $SU(2) \times U(1)$. But i can't understand what is happening. First of all, i can't get the notation here: (where the dot is supposed to mean the trivial representation and the number notation at right of the boxes means $(2I+1)_Y$)

1701379385690.png


I can see that the two box in the same row represents a $6$ represetation of the $SU(3)$. But then, what just happens bellow? He goes on, and show another example

1701379473872.png


I am not sure what exactly these figures means. So the question can be summarized in two individual questions:1) What does the notations means? How do i get this decomposition? That is, what are the rules (I can understand Young tableaux rule, is something like that?) Why the first case above, for example, have $I=0,Y=2/3$?

2) How exactly this show to me that $SU(3)$ decomposes in $SU(2) \times U(1)$?... Just another example:

1701379673076.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The name is Georgi, and it is easier for everyone if you also give the title of the book. The notations are explained in the beginning of the chapter. But your question is very broad. You want one post explanation of one chapter material.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K