Pair-instability supernova calculation

AI Thread Summary
Pair-instability supernovae are significantly brighter than typical supernovae, with calculations indicating they can be 600 billion times brighter than their ancestor stars. The apparent magnitude of such a supernova, calculated as -29.5 when the ancestor star's magnitude is 0, is correct but requires consideration of distance. The apparent magnitude is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the observer, necessitating a comparison between the distances of the ancestor star and the supernova. This results in an unusually high apparent magnitude, even exceeding that of the Sun. The discussion highlights the potential for such distant stars to influence conditions on Earth, despite their minuscule apparent size.
Dinar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Usual supernova 6 billion times brighter then ancestor star. Pair-instability supernova 100 times brighter then supernova 600 billion times brighter then ancestor star. If ancestor star apparent magnitude is 0 then apparent magnitude of pair-instability supernova from that star is = - 2.5* lg(6*10^11) = -29.5 Is my calculation correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, it is correct. I assure you, but the concept is not
the apparent magnitude depends upon the distance also. You also need to compare the distance of the ancestor star from you with the distance of supernova from you. Something like this...
Let the distance from you to ancestor star be d, and distance from you to supernova be x.
Then the apparent magnitude will be -2.5*log((6*10^11)*d^2/x^2), since it is inversely proportional to the square of distance.
That is why you are getting such an unusually high magnitude. In fact, higher than the Sun. It is -26.7.
 
It's hard to imagine that star located several thousand light Earth from solar system with so small apparent diameter just 0.00001'' can potentially create on Earth Mercury weather
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top