Pair Production: Clarification and Explanation

quicksilver123
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
hi,

i just need a quick clarification on pair production.


from my limited understanding, a photon of sufficiently high energy (gramma ray with energy at least equal to the mass of both an electron and positron at rest) will interact with a nucleus in ways that i do not understand to produce a particle pair - an electron and a positron.

i thought, though, that when a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate. would this be the case in this scenario? or would the vectors of the produced particles be such that they would never meet?
if they do annihilate, would the energy produced be equal to the energy of the initial gamma ray? if not, where in the process is energy lost?
if it is the case that annihilation occurs without energy loss, could this scenario repeat ad infinitum?




(in addition, if someone could explain the interaction between the gramma ray photon and the nucleus without resorting to complex maths, i would be much obliged)


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i thought, though, that when a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate. would this be the case in this scenario?
They do not have to annihilate, and pair production is not exactly, but similar to the opposite direction.
or would the vectors of the produced particles be such that they would never meet?
Usually, yes.
if they do annihilate, would the energy produced be equal to the energy of the initial gamma ray? if not, where in the process is energy lost?
A tiny part of the energy will go to the nucleus.
if it is the case that annihilation occurs without energy loss, could this scenario repeat ad infinitum?
No. Apart from the energy lost to the nucleus, annihilation will produce (at least) two photons, both with (roughly) half the energy of the initial photon. In addition, it is rare that the produced particle pair annihilates again.
in ways that i do not understand
Quantum field theory. It just happens.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top