I Pair Production in Empty Space

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
I am not sure this question has been asked here before but I am curious about it. From the Modern Physics Course, I learned that we need a nucleus to create an electron and positron pair (with a photon). And the reason is stated as to conserve linear momentum. If this is the case then how the electrons or quarks created in the early universe?

Is it because in the near-nucleus case we have 1 photon that is creating 2-pairs and in the early universe we can have 2 photons so that there's no need a nucleus or there's something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
And the reason is stated as to conserve linear momentum.
Truth with modification. The reason is conservation of squared total 4-momentum, i.e., com energy.

Arman777 said:
If this is the case then how the electrons or quarks created in the early universe?
This has nothing to do with pair production. If it did there would be equal amounts of quarks and antiquarks, etc. Instead, you need to create a baryon asymmetry. We don't know how that happened, but there are some theories.

In the early universe, photons and fermions were at thermal equilibrium. Mainly due to 2-to-2 scatters. There was almost as much antimatter as matter. As the universe cooled down, the symmetric component annihilated away, leaving just the asymmetric component as surplus matter.
 
Arman777 said:
Is it because in the near-nucleus case we have 1 photon that is creating 2-pairs and in the early universe we can have 2 photons so that there's no need a nucleus or there's something else?
That is a possible process, but there were also other particles around. It doesn't have to be a nucleus, a quark in a quark gluon plasma does the job as well, for example.

Pair production from two photons has been observed in colliders, by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes Arman777
Pair production in the early universe was essentially photon-photon interaction. (Note mfb comment).
 
I see now, thanks all
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top