What is the impact of air resistance on projectile motion?

AI Thread Summary
Air resistance significantly affects projectile motion, requiring adjustments in initial velocity or launch angle to achieve the same target. The discussion explores two methods for calculating air resistance: one using multi-variable calculus and the other breaking the problem into x and y components. The equations presented include Newton's first law and a drag coefficient formula, emphasizing the complexity introduced by air resistance. The Reynolds number for a tennis ball indicates that the drag coefficient is not suitable for Stokes flow, suggesting a need for different calculations. Understanding these dynamics is essential for accurately predicting projectile trajectories in real-world scenarios.
SilverVenom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have a question about how to calculate the air resistance, and eventually how much more energy is required to get the same result, once air resistance has been factored in.

I have thought of two ways to solve the problem: One way requires multi-variable calculus, which I havn't had, the other way entails breaking the equation into x & y components.

The problem I have is as fallows. I have a tennis ball, which has a mass of 57g, that is fired at velocity V and at angle A. If air resistance can be ignored, it will land right on target, however, air resistance can not be ignored. I need to find how much I need to increase the initial velocity, in order to achieve the same result, or alternatively how much I need to change the launch angle.

It seems like this would be a common ballistics question, but I have been unable to find an equation. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance, - Peter

P.S. Here is a good calculator that is related to my problem http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/more_stuff/Applets/ProjectileMotion/jarapplet.html
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Part of the problem could be that you are allowing too many things to vary. For example, given a target, it's possible to vary either A or V (or both)- the two are combined into V*cos(A) and V*sin(A).

In any case, adding air resistance is not too difficult- the equation to solve is:

m ds/dt - D*s = -mg, where D is the drag coefficient (6*pi*R*viscosity) for low Reynolds numbers. s = dv/dt.

Neglecting air resistance, the way to solve the problem is:

m d^2r/dt^2 = -mg, or m ds/dt = -mg which resolves to

m x = c*t
m y = -1/2 mgt^2 + bt + d

putting in V_x(0) = V*cos (A) and V_y(0) = V*sin(A) and x(0) = y(0) = 0 fixes the constants, and the energy put into the ball is 1/2 mV^2. The target point is found by solving for y(t_f) = 0, and x(t_f) is the target.

So, go through the same procedure starting instead from m ds/dt - D*s = -mg. This time, the position of the target is known, y(0) is also known, but the initial velocities are not known. So, solve for those, and then the input energy is still 1/2 mV^2.
 
Sorry I took so long to get back to you. I've had internet outages for the past week or so. :( I worked over your equations, however I am still a little bit confused. In your first equation m ds/dt - D*s = -mg, where D is drag coefficient (6*pi*R*viscosity), if you could walk me through what each variable represents.

For my drag coefficent, a tennis ball in this case, my Reynolds number turns out to be 135000. However this yeilds a giant drag coefficient.

Thanks for the help so far, - Peter
 
Hi Peter,

discussing equations is nearly impossible with ASCII, but here goes:

m ds/dt - D*s = -mg is Newton's first law, s = velocity = dr/dt. I wrote the equation as a linear first-order differential equation becasue it's easier to solve. The solution is easy to find and too messy to try and write down here. The velocity terms will look something like what's on the Wiki page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)

You have different initial conditions, but the exponential component to the velocity is the key effect of air resistance.

The drag I wrote is for Stokes flow- slow flow. Your Reynolds number is definitely *not* small. If you already have a drag coefficiant, that's great- ignore the Stokes equation I put down.

Does this help?
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top