Engineering Parallel Circuits: Learn How to Connect 2k & 4k

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding parallel circuits, specifically how to identify and analyze resistors in parallel when a voltage source is suppressed. Participants explore the characteristics of parallel connections, emphasizing that components are parallel if they share both nodes and experience the same voltage difference. Clarifications are made regarding the identification of resistor pairs, with consensus on R1 || R2 and R3 || R4, while disputing the combination of (R1 + R3) || (R2 + R4) due to shared nodes. The conversation also touches on nodal analysis and the impact of a current source on voltage across resistors, concluding that the current source maintains a consistent current regardless of load changes. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately solving circuit problems involving parallel resistors.
yecko
Gold Member
Messages
275
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


09BC1A23-F80A-4A58-939F-5D11CFE98945.jpeg


Homework Equations


Parallel circuit

The Attempt at a Solution


How can we see 2k//4k (parallel)? There are 2*2k & 2*4k. thanks.
(Though I can obtain the same answer by KVL)
 

Attachments

  • 09BC1A23-F80A-4A58-939F-5D11CFE98945.jpeg
    09BC1A23-F80A-4A58-939F-5D11CFE98945.jpeg
    40 KB · Views: 947
  • Like
Likes ChloeYip and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your attempt at solution? I only see a question.

How are both 2 & 4 k resistor pairs not in parallel when the 6 V source is suppressed? How do you recognize a parallel pair of components?
 
639CAD76-F6AC-43E7-B1F7-F197F0A779CF.png


Without the middle linkage, i would do it like in the pic... but with middle linkage, i have no idea... do you mind to give me some hints please?
 

Attachments

  • 639CAD76-F6AC-43E7-B1F7-F197F0A779CF.png
    639CAD76-F6AC-43E7-B1F7-F197F0A779CF.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 458
  • Like
Likes ChloeYip
With the middle linkage, would you agree that the voltage on the left side of the linkage is the same as the voltage on the right? So the voltage difference between the top of the circuit and the linkage are the same in the left branch or the right branch. Do you see how these two branches (top half) are parallel? In the same way, the bottom half 2 branches are parallel.
 
I don't see how the circuits in your diagram match the circuit from the problem statement. When you suppress a voltage source, what is it replaced with? (hint: The figure in the first post got it right).

I suspect that you need to work on identifying which components are connected in parallel. Let's number the components:

upload_2017-12-5_0-15-1.png


Which resistors are in parallel when the 6 V source is suppressed?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-5_0-15-1.png
    upload_2017-12-5_0-15-1.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 489
  • Like
Likes scottdave
gneill said:
Which resistors are in parallel when the 6 V source is suppressed?
Well... i would short the voltage source first like this:
BF9A4567-458F-4ED4-B556-B62661A03E51.png

scottdave said:
With the middle linkage, would you agree that the voltage on the left side of the linkage is the same as the voltage on the right? So the voltage difference between the top of the circuit and the linkage are the same in the left branch or the right branch. Do you see how these two branches (top half) are parallel? In the same way, the bottom half 2 branches are parallel.
i can see the resistors are symmetric yet i still have no idea how’s the current path goes to visualize it as parallel circuit... do u mind telling me where’s the two parallel branches?

gneill said:
Which resistors are in parallel when the 6 V source is suppressed?
well...that's where i got stuck... i have got no idea...
 

Attachments

  • BF9A4567-458F-4ED4-B556-B62661A03E51.png
    BF9A4567-458F-4ED4-B556-B62661A03E51.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 426
yecko said:
well...that's where i got stuck... i have got no idea...
So, your first task should be to read up on the characteristics of parallel resistors (or parallel components in general). What makes two components parallel? What does being connected in parallel imply for current and voltage for those components? Can you write a paragraph describing how to recognize when two components are in parallel?
 
  • Like
Likes yecko
gneill said:
Can you write a paragraph describing how to recognize when two components are in parallel?
the two resistors are having both nodes common at the 2 ends, so they would experience same voltage difference.however, in this case,
parallel circuit pair i can identify: R1//R2, R3//R4, (R1+R3)//(R2+R4)
the 4 resistors are having 3 nodes in between, how can there be a single pair of parallel resistors to obtain the required voltage?
 
yecko said:
the two resistors are having both nodes common at the 2 ends, so they would experience same voltage difference.
Good!
however, in this case,
parallel circuit pair i can identify: R1//R2, R3//R4, (R1+R3)//(R2+R4)
the 4 resistors are having 3 nodes in between, how can there be a single pair of parallel resistors to obtain the required voltage?
I agree with the two parallel pairs: R1 || R2 and R3 || R4. But I disagree with (R1 + R3) || (R2 + R4). Why? Because R1 and R3 are not series-connected, and neither are R2 and R4. Note that for both of these pairs of resistors, where they connect to each other that connection is not exclusive: in both cases the nodes they have in common are shared with other components as well, so the current path is not exclusive to the resistor pair, hence they do not meet the 'single current path' criteria for series connections.

Now, if you consider your correctly identified parallel pairs, R1 || R2 and R3 || R4, can you re-draw the circuit with those pairs simplified to their equivalent resistance values? Be sure to keep track of which reduced resistor 'contains' R4, since you still need to find the voltage across that component (Vo)!
 
  • Like
Likes yecko
  • #10
Instead of having a linkage joining them, try bringing them so that the nodes joined by the linkage actually touches. Does that help you to visualize the parallel resistors? It is the same exact circuit. There is no voltage drop across the linkage.
 
  • #11
yecko said:
the two resistors are having both nodes common at the 2 ends, so they would experience same voltage difference.however, in this case,
parallel circuit pair i can identify: R1//R2, R3//R4, (R1+R3)//(R2+R4)
the 4 resistors are having 3 nodes in between, how can there be a single pair of parallel resistors to obtain the required voltage?
Look at the Wikipedia article about nodes in circuits. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Node_(circuits)
Nodes are not just single points.
 
  • #12
Were you able to understand how the nodes work? ... and why the resistors are parallel to each other?
 
  • #13
C55493D2-8C96-4027-8B6E-35DBFC4BE369.png

O is it like this?? I have got the answer! Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • C55493D2-8C96-4027-8B6E-35DBFC4BE369.png
    C55493D2-8C96-4027-8B6E-35DBFC4BE369.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 372
  • #14
can I also ask about a very similar circuit?
螢幕快照 2017-12-06 上午9.05.26.png

questions:
a) Use nodal analysis or otherwise, compute Va and Vo.
b) Compute Ib.

my attempt:
I2=I3=4mA*3/4=3mA
I1=I4=4mA*1/4=1mA
Ib=1-3=-2mA

Req(R1&R2)=[1+1/3]^-1=0.75k ohm
Req(R1234)=[1+1/3]^-1 *2=1.5k ohm
Req=1.5+2.5k ohm = 4k ohm
V(source)=-4mA*4kΩ=-16V
V(R1)=16*.75/4=3V
Va=16-3=13V

V(R5)=16*2.5/4=10V
Vo=10V

Am I correct in understanding the circuit? Thanks for all your help and patience!
 

Attachments

  • 螢幕快照 2017-12-06 上午9.05.26.png
    螢幕快照 2017-12-06 上午9.05.26.png
    5 KB · Views: 453
  • #15
You have the correct answers. For extra practice try this. If the wire carrying the current Ib is replaced with a resistor Rb, does the voltage Vo depend on the value of Rb?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #16
The Electrician said:
For extra practice try this. If the wire carrying the current Ib is replaced with a resistor Rb, does the voltage Vo depend on the value of Rb?

Yes, because the Req= R1//R2+R3//R4+Rb, which is of bigger resistance.
The voltage generated by the current source is larger and the Vo=abs(V(source))*(R3//R4)/(R1//R2+R3//R4+Rb), which at current stage there is insufficient information to determine Vo's change.
am i correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #17
This is not correct. Notice that the source is not a voltage source. Why does that make a difference?
 
  • #18
The Electrician said:
This is not correct. Notice that the source is not a voltage source. Why does that make a difference?
the current source give out fixed current while variable voltage; the voltage source give out fixed V while variable I...
the "variable" means it change with respect to resistance in the circuit
yecko said:
The voltage generated by the current source is larger
The Electrician said:
Why does that make a difference?
As resistance of the circuit increase, why is it incorrect?
 
  • #19
The current source puts out a current Is independent of the load on it. The current Is passes through the R1-R2-R3-R4-Rb combination and then into R5. The current in R5 is just Is no matter what the other resistors are. Since the current in R5 is 4 mA, the voltage across R5 is 10 volts no matter what the other resistors are.

If the source had been a voltage source the voltage across R5 would depend on Rb (and the other resistors).
 
  • #20
oh yes! I forgot the R5! Thank you for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K