Thevenin's Theorem with Source Transforms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying Thevenin's Theorem and source transformations to solve a circuit problem. The Thevenin equivalent was determined to be Vth = -4.0 V in series with Rth = 0.8 kΩ. The user explored using source transformations to simplify the circuit, specifically converting a current source of 2.5 mA in parallel with an equivalent resistance of 4/3 kΩ into a voltage source. The final solution confirmed the Thevenin voltage as -4V, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining Thevenin's Theorem with source transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Thevenin's Theorem
  • Source Transformations
  • Loop Analysis
  • Ohm's Law
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Thevenin's Theorem in complex circuits
  • Learn about source transformations in circuit analysis
  • Explore superposition theorem for circuit analysis
  • Practice problems involving voltage dividers and equivalent circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis techniques, particularly Thevenin's Theorem and source transformations.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I was able to find the Thevenin equivalent between ##A## and ##B## using loop analysis and then Ohm's law:

Screen Shot 2014-12-12 at 3.38.19 PM.png


The Thevenin equivalent was ##V_{th} = -4.0 V## in series with ##R_{th} = 0.8 k##.

Now I had a question about solving the problem using a different approach. I realized now source transforms are a sort of "corollary" to Thevenin and Norton's theorems. So I was wondering if it was possible to use those in solving this problem.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



From what I can understand, first I should use ##V = IR \Rightarrow I = \frac{5}{2} mA##. Then I could have a current source in parallel with the ##2k## on the left.

Now ##R_{eq} = (\frac{1}{2k} + \frac{1}{4k})^{-1} = \frac{4k}{3}##.

So I have that ##\frac{5}{2} mA## in parallel with ##\frac{4k}{3}##.

From this point I have not been able to continue using source transforms to simplify to the correct answer. Is it just not possible? Or is it a combination I'm not seeing?

I see that superposition would be useful from this point as well, but I want to know if it's possible with source transforms.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:
So I have that ##\frac{5}{2} mA## in parallel with ##\frac{4k}{3}##.

From this point I have not been able to continue using source transforms to simplify to the correct answer. Is it just not possible? Or is it a combination I'm not seeing?

I see that superposition would be useful from this point as well, but I want to know if it's possible with source transforms.

Convert ##\frac{5}{2} mA## in parallel with ##\frac{4k}{3}## back into a voltage source of 10/3 volts in series with a resistance of 4000/3 ohms. Now you have 2 voltage sources in series with two resistors. Slide the 4000/3 ohm resistor to the right so it's just above the 2k output resistor. Those two resistors form a voltage divider driven by the difference in the two voltage sources.

I get Vth = -4V
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: STEMucator
The Electrician said:
Convert ##\frac{5}{2} mA## in parallel with ##\frac{4k}{3}## back into a voltage source of 10/3 volts in series with a resistance of 4000/3 ohms. Now you have 2 voltage sources in series with two resistors. Slide the 4000/3 ohm resistor to the right so it's just above the 2k output resistor. Those two resistors form a voltage divider driven by the difference in the two voltage sources.

I get Vth = -4V

I tried this earlier, but I messed the numbers up and it didn't spit the right answer out.

Reading your post and going back to it, I face-palmed and realized my mistake. I now get the same answer in 10 different ways so I should be good.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K