Parallel Conducting plates problem

AI Thread Summary
When one of the two parallel conducting plates is charged with +Q while the other remains neutral, the charged plate will induce a negative charge on the face of the neutral plate closest to it. The outer face of the charged plate will have a charge of +Q, while the outer face of the neutral plate will remain neutral, resulting in a total charge distribution of +Q on the inner face of the charged plate and -Q on the inner face of the neutral plate. The electric field at point A (outer side of plate 1) will be zero, at point B (between the plates) will be uniform and directed from the positively charged plate to the negatively charged plate, and at point C (outer side of plate 2) will also be zero. The equations governing the charge distribution can be derived from the total charge conservation and the condition that there is no electric field inside the conductors. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of electric fields and charges in parallel plate configurations.
ajmaeen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If we have two parallel conducting plates ( of surfaces 1msq each), set at a very small distance apart, so that the plates can be considered like infinite plates (no edge effect).

Both plates are neutral at first.

Now a charge (say +Q) is placed on one of the plates. the other still is neutral

What will be the charge on each face of both the plates, and the field at A, B and C, where A is outer side of plate 1, B is middle of plate 1 and 2, and C in outer side of plate 2?


My thoughts:
i know that if the other plate also had an opposite excess charge then on the outer sides charges are 0 , while inside they would be +Q and -Q. so field would also only exist in the middle.

but I am a but confused on what it should be incase of only one plate with the excess charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Create unknowns for the four surface charges. You can immediately write down two equations based on knowing the total charge in each plate. Since there is no field inside either plate, you can develop two more equations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top