Parallel resonance LC circuit question?

AI Thread Summary
At resonance frequency in a parallel LC circuit, the impedance is maximized and is purely resistive, represented by the formula L/CR. The discussion highlights confusion around the derivation of this equation, particularly when considering the resistance of the coil. It explains that when a small series resistance R is included, the impedance can be expressed as Z = (jwL + R)/jwCR, leading to the conclusion that Z approximates L/CR when R is much smaller than jwL. Additionally, the conversation touches on the mathematical concept of the imaginary unit j, clarifying that j^2 equals -1, which is relevant in the context of analyzing AC circuits. The thread concludes with a request for assistance in deriving the resonance frequency when resistance is factored in.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
"At resonance frequency, the circuit impedance is maximum. It is resistive and its value is given L/Cr..."
The book doesn't explain how impedance equals L/Cr, so I'm confused here. How is it derived?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here are the basic equations for a parallel L and C, and no resistance. (w = 2 pi f)

1/Z = 1/jwL + jwC = jwC - j/wL = j(w2LC-1)/wL

So Z = jwL/(1-w2LC)

When LC=1/w2, Z= infinity

[Edit] If you also have a parallel resistor such that

1/Z = 1/jwL + jwC +1/R. then

Z =~ R at resonance.
 
Last edited:
But what about Z=L/C*R where R is the resistance of the coil if we don't neglect it?
 
How do we get that?
 
uzair_ha91 said:
But what about Z=L/C*R where R is the resistance of the coil if we don't neglect it?
Exactly right.
Using the same equations I posted earlier, , and the inductance has a small series resistance R, then

1/Z = 1/(jwL + R) + jwC

et cetera (like in prev. post), leading to (at LC resonance)

Z= (jwL + R)/jwCR.

If R<< jwL, then Z = jwL/jwCR = L/CR

(note: L/C has units ohms2. so L/CR has units ohms)
 
:-) Thanks!
 
uh, can you tell me why/how j2=-1?

Actually I'm studying high school physics so I'm studying the equations without the "j" operator or whatever it is..
 
By definiton, j = sqrt(-1). So, obviously, j2 = -1 since that's the inverse operation. It's just the imaginary number; in mathematics sqrt(-1) = i. EEs like to use j because i already means current.
 
  • #10
uzair_ha91 said:
uh, can you tell me why/how j2=-1?

Actually I'm studying high school physics so I'm studying the equations without the "j" operator or whatever it is..
Hi uzair
There is a real physical basis for j2 = -1. As I showed in an earlier post, the time derivitaves of a circular function V(ωt) = V0 sin(ωt) are

d V(ωt)/dt = ω V0 cos(ωt) = jω V(ωt)

d2 V(ωt)/dt2 = -ω2 V0 sin(ωt) = (jω)2 V(ωt) = j2 ω2 V(ωt) = -ω2 V(ωt)

So you can see in red the shorthand notation for a 90 degree phase shift caused by taking the time derivative, and why j2 = -1.
Bob S
 
  • #11
Sorry for the bump, but I'm working on the problem including the series R with L, and can't seem to figure out how to derive the resonance frequency w_o in that case. Wikipedia lists it as w_0 = sqrt((1/LC) - (R/L)^2), where the impedance is only real.

I have the equation Zin = (R + jwL)/(jwRC-w^2*LC+1), which I have rearranged as

Zin = ((L/C) - jR(w/C))/(R + j(wL - 1/wc))

When I split up the fractions in the rearranged form, I can easily see where the 1/LC term comes from in w_0, but I'm having difficulty seeing how the (R/L)^2 term is derived. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
  • #12
Use Zin = -(R + jωL)/(1 + ω2LC -jωRC)

and multiply both numerator and denominator by 1 + ω2LC +jωRC

This will get the j out of the denominator. The denominator will be (1 + ω2LC)2 + (ωRC)2.

Bob S
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top