Paramagnetic term of the hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter dd331
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Term
dd331
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The Hamiltonian for particle in an EM field is

H = 1/2m (p - qA)^2 + q phi

If we take the cross-terms, which corresponds to the paramagnetic term, we have
<br /> H para = -q/2m * (p.A + A.p )<br /> = iqh/2m * (\nabla .A + A.\nabla)<br />

What I do not understand is how this simplifies into iqh/m * A.\nabla?

assuming that \nabla .A = 0 (i.e. Coulomb gauge). Why does the factor of 1/2 disappears? I'm only a first year undergraduate and I'm learning this on my own. I will appreciate it if you give a fuller answer. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In QM, H is assumed to act on a wave function \psi.
This means that del.A really means del.(A \psi)=(del.A)\psi + (A.del)\psi, so the (A.del) comes in twice.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top