Parameterising a cylinder and determining the flux.

  • Thread starter Thread starter pondzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Flux
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on parameterizing a hollow cylinder's rectangular cross-section in cylindrical coordinates to calculate the flux of a magnetic field defined as B = k(x/(x^2+y^2), y/(x^2+y^2), 0). The original question involves calculating the self-inductance per unit length of a coaxial cable with two conductors carrying equal but opposite currents. A participant initially misidentified the magnetic field's direction, leading to confusion about the flux calculation, which resulted in a zero value. After clarification, they correctly adjusted their approach by using the azimuth unit vector for both the magnetic field and the normal vector, achieving the desired results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate parameterization and understanding the magnetic field's orientation in flux calculations.
pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am wondering how i could parameterise the following rectangular cross section of the hollow cylinder in cylindrical co-ordinates. If this surface is better parameterised via a different co-ordinate system then by all means use that system. After I have completed the parameterisation i would then like to know how to sum up the flux of all these rectangles to get the total flux through the inside of the cylinder .My aim is to determine the flux around the inside of the cylinder (if that makes any sense) between the radii a and b. The vector field in question is B= k(x/(x^2+y^2), y/(x^2+y^2),0). Where B is the magnetic field.

I know that the answer to this question is ## \text{flux} = \frac{L\mu_{0}I}{2\pi}ln{\frac{b}{a}} ## and i was able to calculate (and confirm) this via a much more simplified approach to this problem. But i would now like to attempt the more mathematically rigorous way. Thank you.
CYLINDER WITH HOLE 13123123123123.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The cross section is \{\theta = 0 , 0 \leq z \leq L, a \leq r \leq b\}.
 
pasmith said:
The cross section is \{\theta = 0 , 0 \leq z \leq L, a \leq r \leq b\}.

Hi pasmith, I tried to use this parameterization but, correct me if I am wrong, the normal vector for this is (0,1,0) and the magnetic field becomes (1/r,0,0). The dot product of these two vectors is zero and hence the flux will be zero, however I know this isn't the case.
 
It's not clear exactly what you mean by "flux around the inside of the cylinder." The magnetic field is radial, which suggests some other problems, so it's no surprise that the flux through the cross-sectional area your drew is 0.

What was the original problem? It seems like you're not taking the right approach here.
 
Hi guys, the original question was this (but in this thread i am only interested in calculating the flux, and i do realize there is a much simpler way to find the flux.. but i would like to become familiar with the mathematical rigour);

"Consider a long coaxial cable made of two coaxial cylindrical conductors that carry equal currents I in opposite directions (see figure). The inner cylinder is a small solid conductor of radius a. The outer cylinder is a thin walled conductor of outer radius b, electrically insulated from the inner conductor. Calculate the self-inductance per unit length Ll of this coaxial cable. (Figure 1) ( L is the inductance of part of the cable and l is the length of that part.) Due to what is known as the "skin effect", the current I flows down the (outer) surface of the inner conducting cylinder and back along the outer surface of the outer conducting cylinder. However, you may ignore the thickness of the outer cylinder."

I realized that i incorrectly described the corresponding magnetic field for the question. I thought the direction of the magnetic field was in the radial unit vector direction, which is obviously incorrect, so i used the azimuth unit vector for the direction of the magnetic field and also the normal to the surface of the rectangle and i got the answer I desired. Thank you for your guidance and help!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K