Parametric Curve: Solving & Graphing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Parametric
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Another question...

If I were given these equations:

x = e^t
y = e^-t

Then I have to find the cartesian product for this parametric curve and then I have to sketch the graph of the curve. So here's the cartesian product I came up with:

Solve for t in y, so:

y = e^-t
ln y = ln e^-t
ln y = -t
t = - ln y

Then plug into the x part:

x = e^-ln y

Is that part correct?

I have no idea how to graph this...

Help appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know any identities applicable to it?
 
Simple method: u^{-r}= 1/u^r
slightly longer metheod, try multiplying x and y together!

or:

-log(p) = log(1/p)
e^log(w)=w

any of those help?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top