Parametric equation of a surface-eliminating the parameters

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The parametric equation of a surface is given by:
x = s + t, y = (s2/2) + s f(t) + t, u = s + f(t) where f is some given function (e.g. f(t)=t/2).
I would like to eliminate s and t from these equations and describe the surface in terms of x, y and u only.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


The first equation implies that s=x-t
Put it into the third equation, I get
u = x - t + f(t)
=> u - x = f(t) - t
Now if I can solve for t in terms of u and x, then I can put it into the second equation and I'm done.
But how can I solve for t in the equation u - x = f(t) - t ?
I think this may be related in some way to the idea of "inverse function", but I don't know how to handle it in this case...

Can someone please help me out?
Thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingwinner said:
x = s + t, y = (s2/2) + s f(t) + t, u = s + f(t) where f is some given function (e.g. f(t)=t/2).

=> u - x = f(t) - t
Now if I can solve for t in terms of u and x, then I can put it into the second equation and I'm done.
But how can I solve for t in the equation u - x = f(t) - t ?
I think this may be related in some way to the idea of "inverse function", but I don't know how to handle it in this case...

Can someone please help me out?
Thank you! :)

Hi kingwinner! :smile:

If f(t) = t/2, it's easy!

If f(t) = t2, you need to solve a quadratic equation.

If f(t) is more complicated, there may be no non-computer solution.
 
Hi tiny-tim,

If we assume that the general function f is invertible, can we eliminate s and t from these equations and describe the surface in terms of x, y and u only (perhaps with f and f-1 in the expression) ?
 
kingwinner said:
If we assume that the general function f is invertible …

All functions are invertible (at least locally) …

no, there's no general solution, you have to work it out for each one.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top