Parametric Representations and Parallelism in Linear Algebra Homework Statement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around parametric representations of a line in linear algebra, specifically addressing the conditions under which two representations describe the same line and the implications for the direction vectors involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the two parametric equations, questioning how to establish the equality of points on the line and the conditions for the direction vectors to be parallel.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered initial thoughts on the relationships between the points defined by the parameters, while others emphasize the need for careful reasoning regarding the parallelism of the direction vectors.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions inherent in the problem, particularly regarding the nature of the vectors and the implications of them being representations of the same line.

zacman2400
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



suppose x=x0+tv and y=y0+sw are two parametric representations of the same line l in r^n
a. show that there are scalars t0 and s0 such that y0=x0+t0v and x0=y0+s0w
b. show that v and w are parallel


The Attempt at a Solution



a. same line thus
y0+sw=x0+tv
when s0w=t0w then y0=x0 (essentially the solution...I think)

b. not sure at all
I don't like saying because the problem states: parametric rep of same line then must be parallel, but this is the most obvious statement to me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part b pick any two points on the line [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] corresponding to [itex]t_1[/itex] and [itex]t_2[/itex], respectively. Since the second parameterization is of the same line then there must exist [itex]s_1[/itex] and [itex]s_2[/itex] such that [itex]y_1=x_1[/itex] and [itex]y_2=x_2[/itex], respectively. Can you take it from there?
 
leading us to the idea that y1-x1=y2-x2 meaning 0=0, thus parallel
 
No, you need to slow down and be more careful. You're trying to show that w is parallel to v, which means that w is a nonzero scalar multiple of v.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K