Partial derivative of an ordinary derivative?

Ultimâ
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I think the heading says it all. What happens if we take the partial derivative of a rate for example?

eg \frac{\delta}{\delta t}(\frac{dx}{dt})

If it was normal differentiation with respect to t we'd get acceleration, or \ddot{x}. I read somewhere that the partial can be treated as an ordinary if the top part tends to zero as the bottom part does, but if this is not the case? (such as if we had a function of cos which would approach 1)...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ultimâ said:
I think the heading says it all. What happens if we take the partial derivative of a rate for example?

eg \frac{\delta}{\delta t}(\frac{dx}{dt})

If it was normal differentiation with respect to t we'd get acceleration, or \ddot{x}.

Hi Ultimâ! :smile:

(have a partial: ∂ :smile:)

Partial derivative ∂/∂t simply means that you keep all variables constant other than t.

So if x only depends on t, then ∂/∂t = d/dt.

If x depends on t and something else, then you shouldn't write d/dt.

So ∂/∂t(dx/dt) doesn't really make sense. :smile:
I read somewhere that the partial can be treated as an ordinary if the top part tends to zero as the bottom part does, but if this is not the case? (such as if we had a function of cos which would approach 1)...

Sorry … not following any of that. :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
If x depends on t and something else, then you shouldn't write d/dt.

So ∂/∂t(dx/dt) doesn't really make sense.

This is false. You just need to apply the chain rule. If x is a function of t and some other variable u, then

\frac{d}{dt}[x(t, u)] = \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial x}{\partial u} \frac{du}{dt}

The result will be some function \dot x = \dot x(t, u, \dot u), and then one can certainly take

\frac{\partial}{\partial t}[\dot x(t, u, \dot u)]
 
Thanks for that. As ben mentions, I had a case of a rate of changes (sounds like a rare disease), where the chain rule needed to be applied, and I thought the outcome seemed a bit weird. Thanks tiny-tim for verifying my suspicions that the partial can be treated as an ordinary differential when x is only dependant on t.

Given that's the case, I guess \frac{\delta}{\delta t}(cos\theta) can produce -sin\theta\frac{d\theta}{dt}! (of course given dependence on t)

a \delta{bye\ for\ now}!
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top