Partial derivative using differentials

eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


If xs^2 + yt^2 = 1 and x^2s + y^2t = xy - 4, find \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial x}{\partial t}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}, \frac{\partial y}{\partial t}, at (x, y, s, t) = (1, -3, 2, -1)


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


I took the differential of both equations and substituted in the values and I got:

4ds + 4dx + 6dt + dy = 0 and
ds + 7dx + 9dt + 5dy = 0

but now I don't know how do find the individual partial derivatives that are being asked for. For example, for \frac{\partial x}{\partial s}, I assumed t and y are constant and made dt and dy = 0 and tried to solve for ds and dx but that doesn't work.

Any ideas on how to proceed in finding these partials?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##s## and ##t## don't happen to be independent, so that ## \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial t}{\partial s} = 0##? That would make things much easier.
 
In order that this problem make any sense, s and t have to be independent so Quesadilla's comment is crucial. You should NOT assume y is constant since it is one of the dependent variables. But, taking the derivatives with respect to s you should assume t is constant (I would have said "treat t as a constant").

So from 4ds+ 4dx+ 6dt+ dy= 0 and ds+ 7dx+ 9dt+ 5dy= 0 you can get
4\frac{\partial s}{\partial s}+ 4\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 6\frac{\partial t}{\partial s}+ \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 4+ 4\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ \frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
and
\frac{\partial s}{\partial s}+ 7\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 9\frac{\partial t}{\partial s}+ 5\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 1+ 7\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 5\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
Giving you two equations to solve for \partial x/\partial s and \partial y/\partial.

Do the same thing to find the derivatives with respect to t.

Personally, I wouldn't have use "differentials". Just differentiating xs^2+ yt^2= 1 with respect to s (and treating t as a constant) gives
s^2\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ 2xs+ t^2\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= 0
and differentiating x^2s+ y^2t= xy- 4 with respect to s gives
2sx\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}+ x^2+ 2ty\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}= x\frac{\partial y}{\partial s}+ y\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
again giving two equations to solve for \partial x/\partial s and \partial y/\partial s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quesadilla said:
##s## and ##t## don't happen to be independent, so that ## \frac{\partial s}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial t}{\partial s} = 0##? That would make things much easier.

Why do you claim are s and t not independent? If we arbitrarily specify values of s and t we can then use the equations to find x and y. In fact, I would say we can take s and t as independent, but with x and y being functions of them: x = x(s,t) and y = y(s,t).
 
Last edited:
Ray Vickson said:
Why do you claim are s and t not independent? If we arbitrarily specify values of s and t we can then use the equations to find x and y. In fact, I would say we can take s and t as independent, but with x and y being functions of them: x = x(s,t) and y = y(s,t).

If you mean that we should look to apply the implicit function theorem that sounds like an excellent idea!
 
Great, thanks everyone!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top