Partial differentiation of cos (in vector calculus)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the partial differentiation of the spherical polar coordinates representation of a sphere, specifically the expression for the normal vector derived from the cross product of the partial derivatives. The equation presented is \partial r/\partial s = -aSin(s)Sin(t) i + aCos(s)Sin(t) j + aCot(t) k, which includes a term aCot(t) that participants question as being incorrect. The consensus is that the partial derivative of Cos(t) with respect to s should indeed be zero, indicating a potential error in the notes or a misunderstanding of the notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical polar coordinates
  • Knowledge of vector calculus and partial differentiation
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Experience with cross products in vector mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of normal vectors in spherical coordinates
  • Study the properties of partial derivatives in vector calculus
  • Learn about trigonometric identities relevant to differentiation
  • Examine common mistakes in vector calculus to avoid similar errors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector calculus, particularly those focusing on spherical coordinates, as well as educators looking to clarify common misconceptions in partial differentiation.

Eight
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So using standard spherical polar co-ordinates, my notes define a sphere as

r(s,t) = aCos(s)Sin(t) i + aSin(s)Sin(t) j + aCos(t) k

and the normal to the surface is given by the cross product of the two partial differentials:

[itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/\partial[/itex]s X [itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/dt[/itex]

So my issue is what is in my notes where:

[itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/\partial s[/itex]= -aSin(s)Sin(t) i + aCos(s)Sin(t) j + aCot(t) k

It is the final part that I don't understand. Why is the partial differential of Cos(t) with respect to s Cot(t)? I would have calculated it as zero.

Homework Equations



[itex]\partial[/itex][itex]/[/itex][itex]\partial[/itex]s (aCos(t)) = aCot(t) ?

The Attempt at a Solution



All I can think is that it's using a trig identity? As I understand it the k component should only depend upon t, not just from the above equations but in spherical polar co-ordinates in general, at least how I'm picturing it.



Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you. That looks completely wrong. It should be 0. And it's such a weird mistake that I kept staring at it for some time, wondering if I had misunderstood something. I guess that's what you're doing too. :smile:
 
I keep thinking it must be a mistake too, but if it is a mistake then it is deliberate, as it has been repeated in a number of places. And during lectures where we go through the notes it was never picked up on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K