Partial differentiation of cos (in vector calculus)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Eight
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So using standard spherical polar co-ordinates, my notes define a sphere as

r(s,t) = aCos(s)Sin(t) i + aSin(s)Sin(t) j + aCos(t) k

and the normal to the surface is given by the cross product of the two partial differentials:

[itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/\partial[/itex]s X [itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/dt[/itex]

So my issue is what is in my notes where:

[itex]\partial[/itex]r[itex]/\partial s[/itex]= -aSin(s)Sin(t) i + aCos(s)Sin(t) j + aCot(t) k

It is the final part that I don't understand. Why is the partial differential of Cos(t) with respect to s Cot(t)? I would have calculated it as zero.

Homework Equations



[itex]\partial[/itex][itex]/[/itex][itex]\partial[/itex]s (aCos(t)) = aCot(t) ?

The Attempt at a Solution



All I can think is that it's using a trig identity? As I understand it the k component should only depend upon t, not just from the above equations but in spherical polar co-ordinates in general, at least how I'm picturing it.



Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I keep thinking it must be a mistake too, but if it is a mistake then it is deliberate, as it has been repeated in a number of places. And during lectures where we go through the notes it was never picked up on.