Partial differentiation question rocket trajectory

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of differentiating the expression for rocket trajectory using the chain rule for partial differentiation. Participants emphasize the importance of calculating the square root of the sum of squares of the coordinates, then differentiating with respect to time t. There is a consensus that the variable t should remain in the final expression, as the result is expected to be a function of time. The need to avoid integrating both sides of the equation is highlighted, as it complicates the differentiation process. Ultimately, the conversation underscores the correct application of differentiation techniques in the context of rocket trajectory analysis.
AwfulPhysicist
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem and my attempt are attached

Homework Equations



Chain rule for partial differentiation perhaps

And basic algebra

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm unsure of how to approach this but I differentiated all the expression at the top.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 532
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 508
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you try and differentiate the square root \sqrt{x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 + z(t)^2} to x(t)^2 + y(t)^2 + z(t)^2 first and work from there?
 
AwfulPhysicist said:

Homework Statement


The problem and my attempt are attached

Homework Equations



Chain rule for partial differentiation perhaps
No. The three coordinate functions x(t), y(t), and z(t) are functions of t alone, and you're asked to find dr/dt.

Calculate x2 + y2 + z2, then take the square root, then differentiate with respect to t.
AwfulPhysicist said:
And basic algebra

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm unsure of how to approach this but I differentiated all the expression at the top.

In your work it looks like you're trying to integrate both sides. Try to resist that urge.
 
Mark44 said:
No. The three coordinate functions x(t), y(t), and z(t) are functions of t alone, and you're asked to find dr/dt.

Calculate x2 + y2 + z2, then take the square root, then differentiate with respect to t.In your work it looks like you're trying to integrate both sides. Try to resist that urge.
hi

How can I differentiate this?! Is it just
(Terms)^1/2 and differentiate using chain rule?

Also how would I be able to get rid of the t's at the end?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 471
I've differentiated it using the chain rule, looks horrible

But now I need to get rid of the t's
 
AwfulPhysicist said:
hi

How can I differentiate this?! Is it just
(Terms)^1/2 and differentiate using chain rule?
Yes.
AwfulPhysicist said:
Also how would I be able to get rid of the t's at the end?
You don't get rid of them.
 
AwfulPhysicist said:
I've differentiated it using the chain rule, looks horrible

But now I need to get rid of the t's
Please post your work here in the form, not as an image, and especially not as an image that is turned on its side.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 462
Mark44 said:
Please post your work here in the form, not as an image, and especially not as an image that is turned on its side.
Yeah sorry, sure.
 
  • #10
AwfulPhysicist said:
hi

How can I differentiate this?! Is it just
(Terms)^1/2 and differentiate using chain rule?

Also how would I be able to get rid of the t's at the end?
Yes, it is just (Terms)1/2 and differentiate using chain rule .

You don't get rid of the time. The resulting expression for speed is a function of time, t .
 
  • #11
AwfulPhysicist said:
Also how would I be able to get rid of the t's at the end?

\frac{dr}{dt} is a function of t so you don't want to get rid of the t's. The t's might cancel out in some problems, but, in general, we expect a function of t to have t's in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K