MHB Partial Fraction Decomposition Help - Calculus BC

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the integral of the function (4x^2+x-2)/(x^3+2x^2-3x) using partial fraction decomposition. The denominator is factored as x(x-1)(x+3), leading to the assumption of a decomposition form with constants A, B, and C. The Heaviside cover-up method is employed to find the values of A, B, and C, resulting in A = 31/12, B = 2/3, and C = 3/4. The final decomposition is expressed as (31/12)/(x+3) + (2/3)/x + (3/4)/(x-1), allowing for straightforward integration. The integral evaluates to a logarithmic expression involving the decomposed terms.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Help with Calculus BC: partial fractions!?

Thank you for your help guys. I wrote the problem wrong in the previous question :(

integral (4x^2+x-2)/(x^3+2x^2-3x) dx

howwwww?

Here is a link to the question:

Help with Calculus BC: partial fractions!? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello living higher:

We are given to decompose:

$\displaystyle \frac{4x^2+x-2}{x^3+2x^2-3x}$

The first step is to factorize the denominator:

$x^3+2x^2-3x=x(x^2+2x-3)=x(x-1)(x+3)$

Now we assume the decomposition will take the form:

$\displaystyle \frac{4x^2+x-2}{x(x-1)(x+3)}=\frac{A}{x+3}+\frac{B}{x}+\frac{C}{x-1}$

Now, rather than set up a linear system of equations, I am going to use a shortcut method called the Heaviside cover-up method. Look at the first term on the right. The root of the denominator is $x=-3$.

To find the value of $A$, we "cover-up" the factor $x+3$ to get:

$\displaystyle \frac{4x^2+x-2}{x(x-1)}$

and we evaluate this at $x=-3$ to find:

$\displaystyle A=\frac{4(-3)^2+(-3)-2}{(-3)((-3)-1)}=\frac{31}{12}$

Next we look at the second term in the decomposition and we see the root of the denominator is $x=0$, and covering up the factor $x$ on the left, and evaluating it for $x=0$, we find:

$\displaystyle B=\frac{4(0)^2+(0)-2}{((0)-1)((0)+3)}=\frac{2}{3}$

And finally, we look at the third term in the decomposition and we see the root of the denominator is $x=1$, and covering the the factor $x-1$ on the left and evaluation it for $x=1$, we find:

$\displaystyle C=\frac{4(1)^2+(1)-2}{(1)((1)+3)}=\frac{3}{4}$

And now we may state:

$\displaystyle \frac{4x^2+x-2}{x^3+2x^2-3x}=\frac{31}{12(x+3)}+\frac{2}{3x}+\frac{3}{4(x-1)}$

Now we may directly integrate:

$\displaystyle \int\frac{31}{12(x+3)}+\frac{2}{3x}+\frac{3}{4(x-1)}\,dx=\frac{31}{12}\ln|x+3|+\frac{2}{3}\ln|x|+ \frac{3}{4}\ln|x-1|+C$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top