Partial Fractions: Decomposing a Rational Function

AI Thread Summary
To decompose a rational function P(x) = f(x)/((x-a)(x-b)), the expression can be rewritten as A/(x-a) + B/(x-b). Multiplying both sides by (x-a)(x-b) leads to f(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a), which is valid for all x except a and b. Despite the initial restrictions, substituting x = a or b to solve for A and B is permissible because the resulting equation no longer involves division by zero. This principle holds true even if f(x) is a higher degree polynomial, as the new equation is defined for all x. Thus, the process of finding constants A and B remains valid despite the initial conditions.
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
Suppose we have a rational function ##P## defined by:
$$P(x) = \frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)}$$
This is defined for all ##x##, except ##x = a## and ##x = b##.
To decompose this function into partial fractions we do the following:
$$\frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)} = \frac{A}{x-a} + \frac{B}{x-b}$$
Multiplying both sides by ##(x-a)(x-b)##:
$$f(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a)$$
Which again holds whenever ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##.
To find ##A## or ##B##, we set ##x## equal to ##a## or ##b##, which is confusing. Didn't we state earlier that the rational function, and all steps that took us from the first equation to the last equation, are only valid when ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
Suppose we have a rational function ##P## defined by:
$$P(x) = \frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)}$$
This is defined for all ##x##, except ##x = a## and ##x = b##.
To decompose this function into partial fractions we do the following:
$$\frac{f(x)}{(x-a)(x-b)} = \frac{A}{x-a} + \frac{B}{x-b}$$
In general, no. If f(x) happens to be a constant or a linear polynomial, the above is valid, but if f(x) is a higher degree polynomial or other function, it doesn't work. For example, it doesn't work if P(x) is ##\frac{x^3}{(x - a)(x - b)}##.
MohammedRady97 said:
Multiplying both sides by ##(x-a)(x-b)##:
$$f(x) = A(x-b) + B(x-a)$$
Which again holds whenever ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##.
To find ##A## or ##B##, we set ##x## equal to ##a## or ##b##, which is confusing. Didn't we state earlier that the rational function, and all steps that took us from the first equation to the last equation, are only valid when ##x## does not equal ##a## or ##b##?
The equation f(x) = A(x - b) + B(x - a) is valid for all values of x, including a and b, so there is no problem setting x to either of these values.

Consider the equation ##\frac{x^2 - 4}{x - 2} = x + 2##. The left side is not defined if x = 2. If we multiply both sides by x - 2, we get x2 - 4 = (x + 2)(x - 2). Here, both sides are defined for all values of x. Since we're no longer dividing by an expression that could be zero, there are no longer any restrictions on x.
 
Last edited:
In your example, when both sides of the equation are multiplied by ##x-2##, isn't the fact that ##x ≠ 2## implied?
The value of ##\frac{x-2}{x-2}## is indeterminate if ##x = 2##.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
In your example, when both sides of the equation are multiplied by ##x-2##, isn't the fact that ##x ≠ 2## implied?
Yes. However, in the new equation, there are no restrictions on x.
The two expressions...
##\frac{x^2-4}{x-2} ## and x + 2
have identical values except when x = 2.
The expression on the left is undefined when x = 2, but the expression on the right is defined, and has a value of 4.

When you multiply both sides of the equation ## \frac{f(x)}{(x - a)(x - b)} = \frac A {x - a} + \frac B {x - b}##, you get a new equation that does not involve division, and so is defined for all x, including x = a and x = b. So there is no problem in substituting either of these values to find your constants A and B.
MohammedRady97 said:
The value of ##\frac{x-2}{x-2}## is indeterminate if ##x = 2##.
Yes, of course.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top