MHB Partial Volume of a Cylinder Calculation

CivCalc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It's been a long time since I've attended school, over 33 years ago. So my question may seem basic to many here. I wish to calculate the partial volume of a cylinder for my excel spreadsheet project. The formula I've found is attached. (unable to type it)

But I do not fully understand this formula. Particulalry the R sq cos -1 section. Could somebody please explain how I use cos
Thank You

View attachment 7715
 

Attachments

  • Formula.PNG
    Formula.PNG
    3 KB · Views: 128
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! (Wave)

I don't use Excel, but I imagine it would be something like:

Code:
V=L*(R^2*ACOS((R-D)/R)-(R-D)*SQRT(2*R*D-D^2))
 
Thanks for response. No doesn't work on excel but that's OK, I'll investigate further
 
CivCalc said:
Thanks for response. No doesn't work on excel but that's OK, I'll investigate further

The Basic Spreadsheet
View attachment 7728
B1:B3 are the desired input values.

The formula in B5
View attachment 7729
I added a few sets of parentheses to emphasize order of operations.

You COULD name the cell ranges and refer to their meanings, rather than the cell addresses.
 

Attachments

  • Spreadsheet1.jpg
    Spreadsheet1.jpg
    8.6 KB · Views: 126
  • Spreadsheet2.jpg
    Spreadsheet2.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 120
Yeah, I figured what I gave was correct. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top