Partially specified elements of a group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Group
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
Is there a technical term in group theory for (what I would call) partially specified elements of a group?

I mean "partially specified" in the following sense:

An elements of a group acts as permuation on the set of elements of the group. So a group element can be considered to be a function that is specified by a set of ordered pairs. Suppose we have a set of ordered pairs of group elements that incompletely specifies a 1-1 function on the group. For example if the group elements are {a,b,c,d} we might have the set of ordered pairs { (a,b),(c,a)} which is missing a specification for (b,?) and (d,?).

If A is a partial specification then reversing the ordered pairs in A give a different partial specification which one might call the inverse specification. If A and B are two partial specification then the product can be defined as the partial specification given by forming the composition of the two mappings, insofar as we can do so from the given ordered pairs in A and B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I know it, it's called a "relation".

From wikipedia: "Formally, a relation is a set of n-tuples of equal degree."
 
I like Serena said:
As I know it, it's called a "relation".

I agree that it is a relation, but this type of partial specification is more specific than a general relation. A general relation need not even be a subset of the ordered pairs of a function.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top