Particle Accelerator Safety: Debunking the Myth of Danger | WriterMon

  • Thread starter Thread starter WriterMon
  • Start date Start date
WriterMon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm curious, for a novella I'm writing, whether standing in front of an electron or other particle beam in a particle accelerator would be dangerous for a person. I would think not, because I'd presume the particles would just go through us as they're always doing. But maybe in such concentrated form, they are, like a laser, dangerous?

Thanks,

WriterMon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WriterMon said:
Hello,

I'm curious, for a novella I'm writing, whether standing in front of an electron or other particle beam in a particle accelerator would be dangerous for a person. I would think not, because I'd presume the particles would just go through us as they're always doing. But maybe in such concentrated form, they are, like a laser, dangerous?

Thanks,

WriterMon

If you're talking about a typical 10 MeV or greater particle accelerator, then yes, it will eventually kill you.

Remember what "beta radiation" is. It is high energy electrons. While its ionization factor is smaller than alpha, it is still dangerous enough to damage your body molecules. Proton beams would be even more dangerous.

And we still haven't talked about the bremstralung radiation yet that could even be as lethal. This is why all accelerator facilities are enclosed in radiation shielding.

Zz.
 
For comparison, a TV set electron gun is about 20KeV, isn't it?
 
Ah, many thanks, very helpful. But when you say "eventually," what time frame are we talking? Minutes? An hour?

tx,
WM
 
I'll tell you what I was told when I was working at the Tevatron (Fermilab), which is a proton-antiproton collider - the largest such collider until the LHC at CERN turns on next year. I asked if anyone ever worked in the beam tunnel (not even stand in the beam, just stand next to it) when the beam is turned on, and the guy giving me the tour just started laughing at me. He said that he would give such a person no more than one hour before he died, and it would be the most painful hour he ever experienced!

I know this is not very precise, but that gives you an idea.
 
precise enough, thanks!
E
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top