Particle Collision: Example & Kinetic Energy

samckx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Is there an example in nature of two particles with only an attractive force between them directly colliding? If so, where does the kinetic energy go?

Sam
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermilab collides protons with antiprotons (opposite charge, attractive-Coulomb-force particles), and lots of extra particles emerge from the collision point. The kinetic energy of the collision (≈980 GeV per incident particle) is about 1000 times greater than the rest-mass energy (≈0.938 GeV). See

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/physics/collider/index.html

Bob S
 
Last edited:
Bob,

Thank you for the reply. Do you know if there are other examples in addition to this one? I am curious if this is this example is unique or if there are a range of examples of this type of collision.

Sam
 
The Fermilab Tevatron is the best example (see my previous post) I can think of that has two mutually attractive particles colliding. Three other examples are:

The former LEP (Large Electron Positron) accelerator at CERN colliding electrons and positrons at about 50 GeV per particle.

The former proton anti-proton collider (SPS, Super Proton Synchrotron) at CERN colliding protons and anti-protons at about 300 GeV per particle.

There was also an electron-proton collider at DESY (in Hamburg Germany).

There may be other particle colliders...

Bob S
 
Bob,

Thanks. That gives me a good perspective.

This is a bit of different question, but do you know what physicist theorized about such collisions before there were particle accelerators? I assume they must have considered the possibility.


Sam
 
The first physicist that talked seriously about building a machine for electron-positron collisions (I think) was Burt Richter at Stanford in the mid 1950's (at the Mark III electron accelerator). I now recall that electron-positron collisions were done at the joint MIT-Harvard CEA (Cambridge Electron Accelerator) about 1970.

Theorists? ... I don't know.

Bob S
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top