Particle Entrainment in a Counter-Current Flow Reactor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of particle entrainment in a counter-current flow reactor, specifically a rotating kiln designed for solid feedstock. The kiln is slightly inclined, and the concern is that fine, low-density particles may become entrained by the gas flow, affecting residence time and mass transfer. Participants suggest that calculating the maximum gas velocity without causing entrainment is complex and depends on the particles' size, density, and shape. References to Stokes' law and pneumatic conveying are made as potential avenues for understanding the dynamics involved. The conversation highlights the need for empirical relationships and further exploration of the flow properties of both gas and solid particles.
davidgrant23
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am currently looking to build a rotating kiln to provide the necessary heat/res. time/gases to react a solid feedstock. The problem that I can envision, however, is that the solid (which is fed as small particles) may become entrained in the counter-current gas flow inside the rotating kiln.

Is there some fundamental or empirical relationship between the velocity of the counter-current gas flow and the rate of entrainment of the solid particles?

Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your query sounds a little bit like a fluidized bed.

Where does gravity act in relation to your kiln?

Can you elaborate on what you visualize as entrained?
 
anorlunda said:
Your query sounds a little bit like a fluidized bed.

Where does gravity act in relation to your kiln?

Can you elaborate on what you visualize as entrained?

Hi Anorlunda,

The rotating kiln is inclined slightly away from horizontal (1-5 degrees). The solid particles are fed at the elevated end and travel towards the lower end through rotation of the kiln. While they are traveling a counter-current gas flow is passed through the kiln.

The problem I can envision is that my feedstock (which are fine, low density particles) may become entrained in the counter-current gas flow if the gas velocity is sufficiently high. This will affect the residence time inside the kiln, as well as the mass transfer characteristics. What I'm not sure of, however, is how to take the gas velocity inside the kiln (which I can calculate) and combine that information with the flow properties of the solid particles (density, PSD, shape etc.) to calculate what is the MAXIMUM gas velocity I can run at without having the particles get picked up by the counter current flow and exit the reactor via the gas outlet (instead of the solid outlet).

This problem differs from a fluidized bed reactor as in that case the gas is passed vertically through a stationary bed (inducing fluidization). In this case the particles are traveling horizontally and the flow is counter-current.

Hopefully this cleared up the problem a little.

Cheers,
Dave
 
That sounds very non-trivial. I'm not sure there is a straightforward way to calculate that max velocity.
The size and density of the solid particles would be critical parameters. centimeters? MIcrons?

I'm afraid your question is over my head. Hopefully, others can help.
 
If your gas is flowing upward, the particles settling downward, the particles are well separated, the particles are roughly spherical, and the particles are small, then google Stokes' law. You might also google pneumatic conveyor for cases where flow velocities are higher.
 
Try to check textbooks on cement production.
Regards,
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...

Similar threads

Back
Top