I Why can't we use negative values of n in the 1D particle in a box system?

Thejas15101998
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
In the 1D particle in a box system why don't we take negative integer values of n besides the positive integer values? Well I thought about it and I think the reason is that during derivation we get ka=n (wavelength ) and thus n being negative implies that wavelength is negative hence contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thejas15101998 said:
I think the reason is that during derivation we get ka=n (wavelength ) and thus n being negative implies that wavelength is negative hence contradiction.

what is n?
Iis it related to k= n.pi/L or n.pi/a if a is the width of the box
moreover this condition is due to the acceptable wave function (solution of the Schrodinger equation) being zero at the boundary
i.e. at x=0 and x=a

and which dynamical variable is being quantised ?
Is it energy state ?
and if its energy ,then it may be proportional to n^2 rather than n.
 
Quantum states are uniquely defined up to a complex phase factor. What difference is there between ±n?
 
Thejas15101998 said:
In the 1D particle in a box system why don't we take negative integer values of n besides the positive integer values?
How does the wave function change for e.g. the second eigenstate if you replace n = +2 with n = -2? Does this make any difference in physically measurable quantities?
 
Here we are considering the time independent Schrödinger equation.
 
This may not make any difference in the physically measurable that is probability.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top