Particle in a Box: Odd/Even Parity Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
AI Thread Summary
In a one-dimensional box with impenetrable walls at x=0 and x=L, the eigenfunction is given by Ψ(x) = √(2/L)sin(nπx/L), which is mathematically of odd parity. However, the eigenstates exhibit alternating symmetry, leading to confusion about their odd and even parity classification. When the origin is shifted to the center of the box, two sets of eigenfunctions emerge: one with odd parity and another with even parity. This difference arises because the natural axis of symmetry is at x=L/2, which influences the parity classification. Understanding this symmetry is crucial for correctly interpreting the parity of the wave functions in different configurations.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider a particle in a 1-D box with impenetrable walls at x=0 and x=L. Then the eigen function for this problem is of the form,
\Psi(x) = \sqrt{2/L}sin(n\pi\ x/L)
This is always of odd parity. The question which is troubling me is that, in this case though the eigen function seems to be of odd parity mathematically, when see their eigen states, they are alternately symmetric and anti-symmetric i.e odd and even parity.
On the contrary, if the origin is shifted to the centre of the box in which case the particle is confined between -L/2 to +L/2, then there are 2 sets of eigen functions. One set of functions is of odd parity and other set of functions is of even parity. Since both are of same width, how can there exist such a difference? Could someone point out the flaw in my understanding?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first situation with walls at x=0 and x=L, the solution you gave is correct and it has odd parity with respect to the origin. However, that equation only gives the particle's wave function from 0 to L. The functions have alternating odd and even parity with respect to x=L/2 though. I hope that helps.
 
the results are equivalent, but as L/2 is the natural axis of symmetry of the system, that's the one I'd condier parity in
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top