Particle in a Box: U=0 Inside, ∞ Outside

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
AI Thread Summary
In the particle in a box model, the potential energy (U) is set to zero inside the box to simplify calculations, while it is considered infinite outside to prevent the particle from existing there. This infinite potential ensures that the particle is confined within the box, leading to discrete energy levels. When calculating probability, the range initially extends from negative to positive infinity, but it is adjusted to 0 to L since the probability of finding the particle outside the box is zero. Integrating over the range where the probability is non-zero (0 to L) yields meaningful results. This approach effectively captures the behavior of the particle within the defined constraints of the box.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
for a particle in a box,
why is U a constant=0 in the box but infinite on the outside?


also why when you are calculating the probabilty, the range is from negative infinity to positive infinity? and then why do you have to change it to go from 0 to L?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the case of a particle in a box one contstraints the particle to be found only inside the box so that the probabality for the particle to be found outside the box is zero.

To describe this situation with a potential one has to use an infinite potential outside the box, so that a particle just doesn't have enough energy to be found in this region.

Because the probability to find the particle somewhere is only nonzero for 0<x<L these limits can be used in integrals, the rest doesn't contribute anything to the value of the integral.
 
asdf1 said:
for a particle in a box,
why is U a constant=0 in the box but infinite on the outside?
also why when you are calculating the probabilty, the range is from negative infinity to positive infinity? and then why do you have to change it to go from 0 to L?

Pretty much what da_willem said- I'm just "wordier". First of all, potential is always "relative" to some base so you can always take the potential at some point to be 0. In this simple (non-realistic) example, the point is to look at a sharp jump in potential so it assumes a constant potential inside the box which can then be taken to be 0- actually any constant would give the same result.

With a finite "potential well"- that is if the potential were any finite value, as long as it was larger than the total energy of the particle, outside the box, you would find the particle has some probability of being outside the box- where, classically, it doesn't have enough energy to be! Taking the potential outside the box to be "infinite" (again, non-realistic) simplifies the calculations greatly giving discreet eigenvalues and forcing the particle to be within the box.

In general, to find the expected position of the particle, you would have to integrate the "probability" function over all space: x, y, z going from -infinity to infinity(you may be working in only one dimension but it's the same thing). If that probability function is 0 outside some area- in this case, outside the box, then, as da-willem said, that part of the integral will be 0 and can be ignored. I presume, though you didn't say it, that the box has one corner at (0,0,0) and sides of length L. Integrating from 0 to L covers all the region in which the probability function can be non-zero.
 
thank you very much for clearing up myquestions!!! it is very helpful~ :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top