Probability and Energy of a Particle in Coherent State

In summary, the expected value of energy at ##t=0## is ##\frac{9}{2}\hbar \omega## and the uncertainty is ##\frac{97}{4}(\hbar \omega)^2##. The probability of measuring an energy less than ##3\hbar \omega## at ##t=0## is dependent on the coefficients of the expansion of the coherent state in Fock space, which can be calculated by finding the inner product between the coherent state and the energy eigenstates. Similarly, the probability of measuring an energy less than ##3\hbar \omega## at ##t=\frac{\pi}{\omega}## is dependent on the time evolution of the state.
  • #1
skrat
748
8

Homework Statement


A particle in harmonic potential $$H=\hbar \omega (a^\dagger a+1/2)$$ is at ##t=0## in coherent state $$a|\psi>=2|\psi>$$ a) Calculate expected value of energy and it's uncertainty at ##t=0##
b) With what probability do we at ##t=0## measure the energy less than ##3\hbar \omega##?
c) And what if we measure it at ##t=\frac \pi \omega##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have to apologize, but I only have an idea on have to try with the a) part, while I haven't got a clue on b) and c).
a)$$<H>=<\psi |H|\psi>=\hbar \omega( <\psi|\psi>+<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>$$ I hope I can say that ##<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>=2<\psi|a^\dagger |\psi>=2<a\psi|\psi>=4<\psi|\psi>=4##

Than ##<H>=\frac 9 2 \hbar \omega##. $$<H^2>=(\hbar \omega)^2(<\psi|(a^\dagger a)(a^\dagger a)|\psi>+<\psi|a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4)$$
Now I am not sure what to do with ##<\psi|(a^\dagger a)(a^\dagger a)|\psi>##... :/

b) and c).. I would be really happy to get a hint here :/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
(a) What kind of relations do you know that let's all of the annihilation operators act to the right and all the creation operators to act to the left?

(b) What states have energy less than this? What is the probability of being in one of these states?

(c) Same as (b) with the additional question: How does the state evolve with time?
 
  • #3
a) I didn't quite understand your question, but I did manage to get a solution, hopefully without mistakes: $$<H>=\frac 9 2 \hbar \omega $$ and $$<H^2>=<\psi|(a^\dagger a+1/2)^2|\psi>=(\hbar \omega)^2(<\psi|a^\dagger (aa^\dagger) a|\psi>+<\psi |a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4<\psi|\psi>)$$ It is useful to realize that ##[a,a^\dagger]=1## because this tells me that ##aa^\dagger =1+a^\dagger a##. Using this gives me
##<\psi |a ^ \dagger (aa ^ \dagger ) a | \psi>## ##=<\psi |a ^ \dagger a| \psi >+## ##<\psi |a ^ {\dagger 2} a^2| \psi >=##
##=2<\psi | a ^ \dagger \psi >+## ##4<\psi |a ^{\dagger 2}| \psi >## ##=2<a \psi | \psi >+## ##4<a ^ {\dagger 2} \psi | \psi >## ##=4+16##
And the second and third term in Hamiltonian together are $$<\psi |a^\dagger a|\psi>+\frac 1 4<\psi|\psi>=4+\frac 1 4 $$ Therefore $$<H^2>=(\hbar \omega) ^2 \frac{97}{4}$$.

Would this be ok?

b) Yes I thought about this. Generally speaking, what Hamiltonian does is $$H|\psi>=\hbar \omega(n+1/2)|\psi>$$ which leaves me with 3 possible states ##n\in {0,1,2}## if ##E\leq 3\hbar \omega##. BUT probability of being in any of those states is what I am having troubles with, because If I am not mistaken all states are possible.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
skrat said:
It is useful to realize that [a,a†]=1[a,a^\dagger]=1 because this tells me that aa†=1+aaaa^\dagger =1+a^\dagger a.

Yes, this is what I was referring to.

(b) What you write is true for the energy eigenstates, not for the general state ##|\psi\rangle##. What is the probability of being in any eigenstate if you know the wave function of the current state and the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian?
 
  • #5
b) Hmmm... Well, a general state ##|\psi>## could be (or is?) a superposition of eigenstates ##|\psi>=\sum _n C_n|n>##, if so, than ##|C_n|^2## is the probability to be in ##n## eigenstate.
And I am assuming this is not what you wanted to hear, because this doesn't help at all. :D
 
  • #6
It is, the question is how you are going to extract the ##C_n## coefficients.
 
  • #7
And how can I do that?
 
  • #8
If you had a vector you can write it as a linear combination of the basis vectors, how would you extract the ith component of the vector? (I.e., the coefficient of the ith basis vector)
 
  • #9
Multiply everything with the ith basis vector.
 
  • #10
Exactly. Therefore ...
 
  • #11
##|\psi>=\sum _n C_n|n> \Rightarrow <n|\psi>=C_n##

But I would need some numbers, right? Why do I have a feeling that this is supposed to be really simple and I just can't see it?
 
  • #12
How do you express the inner product between two states in position basis?
 
  • #13
##<n|m>=\int \psi_n\psi_m^*=\delta _{n,m}##

Position basis? I think I have never done that. Does this add ##cos(\vartheta )## in the equation above?
 
  • #14
You probably have but you might not have called it that, it is the most common basis where you represent the states by their wave functions.
 
  • #15
Ok maybe, just maybe I got it now.

We can expand coherent states in Fock space $$|z>=e^{-\frac 1 2 |z|^2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{\sqrt{n!}}|n>$$ which in my case for ##n\in
\begin{Bmatrix}
0,1,2
\end{Bmatrix}## means $$e^{-2}|0>+2e^{-2}|1>+\frac{4}{\sqrt 2}e^{-2}|2>$$ This than gives me the desired coefficients and possible energies.
 
  • #16
Correct, but note that if you are not given this form of a coherent state, you must first show that you can write the expansion on this form.
 
  • Like
Likes skrat
  • #17
THANK YOU! (also for some other problems I had)
 

1. What is a particle in coherent state?

A particle in coherent state is a quantum mechanical system that exhibits properties of both a classical particle and a wave. It is described by a coherent state wavefunction, which is a superposition of all possible energy eigenstates of the system. This means that the particle has a well-defined position and momentum, but also displays wave-like behavior.

2. How is a particle in coherent state different from other quantum states?

A particle in coherent state differs from other quantum states in that it is a non-classical state that exhibits properties of both a particle and a wave. Unlike other quantum states, it has a well-defined position and momentum, and its wavefunction does not collapse upon measurement.

3. What are the applications of particles in coherent state?

Particles in coherent state have many applications in quantum optics, quantum computing, and quantum information processing. They are used in technologies such as lasers, optical communication, and quantum cryptography.

4. How are particles in coherent state prepared in the laboratory?

Particles in coherent state can be prepared by using a coherent light source, such as a laser, to interact with a quantum mechanical system. This can be achieved by controlling the phase and amplitude of the light, which determines the properties of the coherent state.

5. Can particles in coherent state be observed directly?

No, particles in coherent state cannot be observed directly. This is because their wavefunction does not collapse upon measurement, and thus, they do not have a well-defined position. However, their effects can be observed indirectly through interference patterns and other quantum phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
716
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
581
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
95
Views
5K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
662
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
313
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
142
Back
Top