Particle in linear accelerator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving an electron in a linear accelerator, specifically focusing on the forces acting on the electron and the power it radiates during acceleration. The subject area includes concepts from electromagnetism and relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of force using the equation F=E_0*e and question the validity of the Larmor formula in a relativistic context. There is exploration of different formulas for calculating instantaneous radiated power and how they relate to the particle's acceleration and energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing insights and references to external resources. There is a recognition of the complexity introduced by relativistic effects, and multiple interpretations of the equations are being explored without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the applicability of certain formulas under relativistic conditions and the assumptions regarding the relationship between acceleration and energy. Participants are also referencing specific sections from external texts to support their reasoning.

_Matt87_
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron ([itex]e=1.6x10^(-19)[/itex] Coulomb) of total energy 10.22 MeV ([itex]\gamma[/itex] about 20) is undergoing linear acceleration due to application of a uniform electric field of strenght [itex]E_0=1000 MV/m[/itex]
a)how large is the applied force, in Newton?
b) Calculate the instantaneous radiated power in watts


Homework Equations



i think that for b) it would be : [itex]P=\frac{2}{3}*\frac{e^2}{m^2*c^3}*(\frac{dE}{dt})^2[/itex]
but not so sure after all


The Attempt at a Solution



a) F=[itex]E_0[/itex]*e ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For (a), I agree, I think it's that simple.

For (b), the Larmor formula does not apply because this is so relativistic (gamma = 20!). You will have to use the relativistic formula; see section 8.2 here:

http://physics.usask.ca/~hirose/p812/notes/Ch8.pdf

Note that getting acceleration from force (Newton's second Law) must be corrected for relativity, you can't just use F = ma.
 
so for linear acceleration:

[tex]P(t')=\frac{2}{3}\frac{e^2\dot{\beta^2}}{3c}\gamma^6[/tex]

right? it's from 8.3 in the pdf you sent.
Although at the very end of that chapter there is still the same equation I wrote earlier. And it says 'Note that the radiation power due to linear
acceleration is independent of the particle energy or the relativity factor [itex]\gamma[/itex]'

so what now then?

and what's for circulair motion ?:
[tex]P(t')=\frac{2}{3}\frac{e^2|\dot{v}|^2}{c^3}\gamma^4[/tex] ?
 
I'm looking at Jackson v3 eqns. 14.26-14.28 (hopefully you have a copy), they derive the formula as in the PDF as being dependent on the acceleration, then write acceleration as dp/dt, then write dp/dt as dE/dx, which they interpret as being entirely from the external field. In other words, the acceleration of the particle is entirely caused by the external fields.

So does it depend on the particle energy? No, only on the particle's acceleration.

Does it depend on gamma? No, it depends on dE/dx. BUT, if you try to write dE/dx in terms of dbeta/dt, then the factor of gamma^6 reappears. This is irrelevant in your problem (as in real experiments), as you have dE/dx given.

So I agree with you that the Larmor formula will give you the right answer. But, as presented in Griffiths for example, it only applies to non-relativistic motion -- if you want to use it for relativitistic particles, you have to explain why it is valid.

As for circular motion, this is correct in terms of the particle acceleration -- if you write it in terms of dE/dx = dp/dt (Jackson 14.47), it will depend only on external parameters as before -- except for the factor of gamma^2, which cannot be gotten rid of. This is why we can't do e-e+ collisions in the LHC for example ("synchrotron radiation"); we need an ILC.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K