Particle Movement w/o Knowing a or v

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ronnin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement Particle
AI Thread Summary
An object is dropped from an unknown height and takes 4.15 seconds to reach the ground, while being tossed upwards to 2 meters and then falling back takes 6.3 seconds. The height of the cliff is calculated using the equation x = x + vt + 1/2at^2, yielding -8.6115s^2(a). To solve for the upward and downward motion, it's suggested to treat the problem as two separate scenarios: one for the upward motion and another for the downward drop from 2 meters. The equations needed involve the initial velocity and acceleration, and there is a need to rearrange and substitute values to isolate the unknowns. The discussion also touches on the mathematical manipulation of units, confirming that squaring 5m*s^2 results in 25m^2*s^4.
Ronnin
Messages
168
Reaction score
1
Object is dropped from a cliff of unknown height. I'm on another planet without the knowledge of the planet's gravitational acceleration. The object takes 4.15s to reach the bottom. Again, from the top of the cliff I toss the object upwards to a height of 2m then it falls back to the cliff bottom. This takes 6.3s.
I solved for the height of the cliff using the standard x=x+vt+1/2at^2 and yeilded -8.6115s^2(a). How can I move on with upward then downward equation with only knowing a=cliff height/8.6115s^2 and not knowing the initial velocity of the object being thrown upward. Any suggestions on what to start solving for first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When dealing with an object tossed upwards that is under a constant acceleration downwards, it is often easier to think of it as two problems:

In the first, the ball is thrown upwards, and stops 2m up. In the second, it is dropped freely from 2m above the clifftop. In the second you do know the initial velocity...
 
You have 3 unknowns, x, the height of the cliff, a, the acceleration, and u, the initial velocity in part 2. So you need 3 equations to find them. The first one, which you have, is x=\frac{1}{2}at^2_{1}, where t1=4.15s, the second one uses that same equation you quoted, but with different values for x, v and t, (use the second situation) and the third one is for the initial velocity u in terms of acceleration and distance only. You don't want to include the time, so do you know the equation you'll need? Think of a part of situation 2 where you know the distance and the final velocity. (Think about what the velocity of a body thrown upwards is at its maximum height.) Then you need to rearrange and substitute until you have the unknown you want. I hope this isn't too cryptic, I have a feeling it is. Just say if you don't follow me.
 
So am I right to solve for a in the first equation? Doest the second look like 2m=(8.6115s^2)a+vt+[(x/(8.6115s^2)t^2]/2 or am I way off?
 
Quick question. If I have 5m*s^2,then I square that do you get 25m^2*s^4 ? Reason I ask is the following. I setup an equation for the upward motion as follows. 0=V^2 + 2a(2meters) and wound up with V=2m(-a)^(1/2)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top