Particle of certain mass moving in an xy plane

AI Thread Summary
A 0.39 kg particle's motion in the xy plane is described by specific equations for x(t) and y(t). The net force magnitude was calculated as 16.45 N, but there was confusion regarding the angles for parts B and C. The correct approach for finding the angle of the net force involves using the tangent function, yielding an angle of 148.57 degrees relative to the positive x-axis. For the angle of the particle's direction of travel, the correct calculation gives 140.71 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting angles based on the coordinate system used.
eximius
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.39 kg particle moves in an xy plane according to x(t) = - 13 + 1 t - 6 t^3 and y(t) = 28 + 5 t - 11 t^2, with x and y in meters and t in seconds. At t = 1.0 s, what are (a) the magnitude and (b) the angle (within (-180°, 180°] interval relative to the positive direction of the x axis) of the net force on the particle, and (c) what is the angle of the particle's direction of travel?

Homework Equations



F(y) = ma(y)
F(x) = ma(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I've got the magnitude of the force correct as 16.45N after finding the second derivative of x and y and then using Pythagoras's theorem.

What I'm struggling with is part B and C. From what I understand both answers should be the same, as the direction of Fnet should be the direction of travel.

I attempted to calculate the angle between the force and the y axis. I used sin^-1 theta = 22/28.43. This gave me a value for theta of 50.71 degrees. I then added 90 degrees to this to get the angle relative to the positive x axis. Getting an answer of 140.71 degrees for both B and C. But this is apparently wrong.

Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The y-component and the x-component of the force, together with the total force vector, form a right triangle. The angle you want has the y-component as the side opposite to it, and the x-component as the side adjacent to it. Therefore:

θ = tan-1(Fy/Fx)
 
Also, for part C, you want the angle of the position vector, not the force vector. So the answers to part B and C will NOT be the same.
 
Therefore the answer to B will be:

θ = tan-1(8.58/14.04) = 31.43 degrees
Relative to positive x-axis = 180 - θ = 148.57 degrees

And the answer to C will be:

θ = tan-1(22/18) = 50.71 degrees
Relative to positive x-axis = θ + 90 = 140.71 degrees

Is that right? And thanks for the help, it's much appreciated.
 
eximius said:
Therefore the answer to B will be:

θ = tan-1(8.58/14.04) = 31.43 degrees
Relative to positive x-axis = 180 - θ = 148.57 degrees

And the answer to C will be:

θ = tan-1(22/18) = 50.71 degrees
Relative to positive x-axis = θ + 90 = 140.71 degrees

Is that right? And thanks for the help, it's much appreciated.

I don't understand why you're doing these weird shifts. Draw a picture. Assuming that you're taking up to the positive y-direction and rightwards to be the positive x-direction, then the original angles you get (31.43 and 50.71) are fine (i.e. they are already measured from the positive x-axis). They lie within the specified ranges and there is no need to apply these offsets to them.

Note: I haven't checked your arithmetic. What I'm saying is that assuming that 31.43 and 50.71 are actually correct values in the first place, then there is no need to do anything else to them.
 
I used the 2 equations to calculate the position of the particle at t = 1, I get (-18,22). This shows that the particle is traveling North West. Doesn't the negative value of x indicate that I need to resolve the angles to the 2nd quadrant?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top