Particle & Wave Nature of EM Energy: Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karthikeyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Waves
Karthikeyan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
I have some question regarding particle and wave nature of EM energy.

1. What is a wave and a particle? How are they related?
2. Also, we know that sun light travels through the universe down to earth..so light can travel without any medium...But waves do require medium to travel..so how is it? Does the EM energy takes particle form to traverse medium less area and wave form in a medium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A wave does not have matter but a particle does.
And who said wave needs a medium to travel ! well they are related by einstins relativity equation.E=mc square. and can be explained by the wave particle duality of quantum physics.
every particle is wave and wave is particle. it may seem strange but has meen proved.
 
Thanks for the replies...I asked this question becoz I had few basic doubts now that with these replies let me formulate them too
1. Fine that light can travel without a medium but how does it happen...In a medium I can say that the energy propagates itself through the medium but how is it where there is no medium
2. Fine again that E=mc^2 relates particle to wave, but I would appreciate a more practical explanation since that would help me understand few basics in quantum physics..I mean wave is energy packets right then what is particle...is it a single energy packet or something like that
 
confused!

priya_india said:
A wave does not have matter but a particle does.
And who said wave needs a medium to travel ! well they are related by einstins relativity equation.E=mc square. and can be explained by the wave particle duality of quantum physics.
every particle is wave and wave is particle. it may seem strange but has meen proved.

Does every particle is a wave or every particle acts as if guided by a wave between the position measurements? I am really confused about that.
Thanks
 
Karthikeyan said:
Thanks for the replies...I asked this question becoz I had few basic doubts now that with these replies let me formulate them too
1. Fine that light can travel without a medium but how does it happen...In a medium I can say that the energy propagates itself through the medium but how is it where there is no medium
It's not that anybody knows that light waves aren't disturbances in some medium. It's just that the medium is, so far, undetectable. So what would you say about this hypothetical medium? Anyway, Einstein developed a nice kinematics that doesn't require referencing the light medium -- and physicists can carry on with their work as if such a medium doesn't exist. But really, nobody knows.

Karthikeyan said:
2. Fine again that E=mc^2 relates particle to wave, but I would appreciate a more practical explanation since that would help me understand few basics in quantum physics..I mean wave is energy packets right then what is particle...is it a single energy packet or something like that
A wave is a frequency distribution. A particle is what's being distributed.

For example, in quantum experiments involving very weak light going through, say, a double-slit apparatus and producing a predictable pattern (after thousands of 'dots' had been produced) of individually appearing 'dots' (that is, the patterns are generated dot-by-dot) on a detecting screen. You can think of the individual 'dots' as the particles (or photons) in this sort of situation and their distribution on the screen as the wave (or, in the case of a double-slit setup, what's produced via the interaction or interference of two waves).

What are the precise physical characteristics of the 'optical disturbance(s)' (the light) that traveled between the emitter and the detecting screen to produce the observed pattern? Nobody knows. But qm treats the situation between emission and detection as if it were a wave.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top