Particle with mass m and force F(t). Show that x = x(t)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the position function x(t) for a particle of mass m under the influence of a force F(t) = A cosh(βt). The initial condition states the particle starts at rest at x = 0. The attempt to show that x(t) approximates to (1/2)(F_0/m)t^2 at small t leads to integrating the acceleration derived from the force. The user finds that as t approaches 0, x(t) approaches 0, indicating minimal movement, but seeks clarification on confirming the approximation. A suggestion is made to expand x(t) using a Maclaurin series to identify the dominant term for small t.
kafn8

Homework Statement


A particle of mass m is initially at rest at x = 0.
It is acted upon by a force F = A cosh (\beta t) (1)

A) Show that at very small values of t, the position is approximately given by x(t) = \frac{1}{2}\frac{F_0}{m}t^2 (2),
where F_0 is the force at t =0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


If F(t) = Acosh(\beta t) = ma(t)
then a(t) = \frac{A}{m}cosh(\beta t)

Integrating twice yields the position such that
x(t) = \frac{A}{\beta^2 m}\left[ cosh(\beta t) - 1 \right], (3)

Also, F_0(t=0)=m\left[\frac{A}{m}cosh(\beta(0)) \right]=A

With that out of the way, I've tried taking the limit of (3) as t \rightarrow 0 but end up with the following:
$$\lim_{t \rightarrow 0}x(t) = \lim_{t \rightarrow 0} \frac{A}{\beta^2 m}\left[ cosh(\beta (0)) - 1 \right]$$
$$= \frac{A}{\beta^2 m}\left[ (1) - 1 \right]$$
$$= 0$$

But all this says is that for very small values of time, the particle barely moves away from x=0. This does not directly confirm that (2) is a good approximation. Any guidance is much needed and greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if you expand ##x(t)## as a Maclaurin series and keep only the dominant term?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top