• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Partition Function

  • Thread starter ak416
  • Start date
  • #1
122
0
This is a question about thermal physics. There's this partition function Z = sum over all states s of the system ( exp(-E_s/T)). And its just used to calculate the probability of any state by taking the Boltzman factor exp(-E_s/T) of that state and dividing over the partition function. Theres one question that asks to show that the partition function for a combined system, Z(1and2) = Z(1)*Z(2). I understand the way its proved, you just take a double sum and say that E(1and2) =E(1)+E(2), so you can separate the sums. But by using a double sum arent you possibly overcounting some states? For example if E_s1 + E_s2 = 1 + 3 and E_s1 + E_s2 = 3 + 1, also 2+2... Shouldnt this just count as one state of the system, call it E_s = 4. Or would it be better to just keep it this way and then whenever you want to count the probability of observing an E = 4 of the double system, you would have to add all the possible boltzman factors corresponding to E = 4. I think i just answered my question..., but im just wondering whats the right way to think about it, because theres another part in the book about ideal gases talking about how when you have a system with distinct particles you can overcount, but when you have a system with identical particles, you have to multiply the partition function by 1/N! They also say at the end that in our argument we have assumed that all N occupied orbitals (i guess they mean energy levels) are always different orbitals. How does this change anything?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Physics Monkey
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,363
34
The assumptions here are independence and distinguishability. It isn't true that that the partition function of a composite system is simply the product of the partition functions of its subsystems if the subsystems interact or if they are identical. The [tex] 1/N! [/tex] in the classical partition function of an ideal gas is the classic example of this subtlety.
 
  • #3
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
16
ak : It sounds like your doubt is just another way of stating the Gibbs Paradox. You might want to look that up too.
 
  • #4
Do you suppose you could explain how you arrived at the answer in the first place?

Z = sum[exp(e/T)]

so Z(1+2) = Z(1)Z(2)

....

a double sum -- as in sum[ exp(e1/t) + exp(e2/t) ] = sum[exp(s1/t)*sum[sum[exp(s2/t)]
??

I understand the partition function idea - but I'm poor with sums :|
 

Related Threads for: Partition Function

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
915
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
Top