Passenger lands plane after pilot dies in mid-air

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the incident where a passenger landed a plane after the pilot died mid-air. Participants explore the challenges and procedures involved in landing a King Air aircraft, touching on pilot qualifications, flight procedures, and the emotional state of the passenger during the event.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the passenger, despite being a licensed pilot, expressed uncertainty about landing the plane, questioning whether to kill the throttle upon touchdown.
  • Others argue that the passenger's qualifications do not necessarily imply confidence in handling the situation, suggesting he felt unqualified to land the plane.
  • Several participants discuss the technical aspects of flying a King Air, with one asserting that basic flight and landing procedures are similar across various aircraft types.
  • There is a debate about whether a King Air should be classified as a jet due to its turbo prop engines, with differing opinions on the implications for flight procedures.
  • Some participants express concern about the potential damage to the engines during landing, while others prioritize safely landing the aircraft over engine preservation.
  • A few comments reference flight simulators and their limitations in preparing someone for real-life flying situations.
  • Humor is present in the discussion, with participants making light-hearted remarks about flying and the complexities of handling multiple engines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the passenger's qualifications and the procedures for landing a King Air. There is no consensus on the best approach to landing the aircraft or the implications of the passenger's experience.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding specific aircraft procedures, especially regarding engine management during landing, but acknowledge that their knowledge may vary based on personal experience and training.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
..."I need help. I need a King Air pilot to talk to. We're in trouble," he radioed.

Then he turned to his wife and two daughters: "You all start praying hard."

Mr White tried to stay calm and listen to the air traffic controllers as they relayed instructions.

"It was a focused fear," he said. "And I was in some kind of a zone that I can't explain."

Flying by hand, he navigated the plane through the descent.

"When I touch down, if I ever touch down, do I just kill the throttle or what?" he asked...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-lands-plane-after-pilot-dies-in-mid-air.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh good grief, he has a pilot's license! Not exactly an untrained "passenger".
 
Do I kill the throttle? What a stupid question for a pilot to ask.
 
Sounds like he shouldn't have a pilot's license...
 
I think it's fair to say that he didn't feel qualified to land the plane.

Evo, how could I possibly pass on that title? :biggrin:
 
OMG! This plane has too many engines! What do I do?
 
What do you do?? You fly it by hand Mr. White(as-a-sheet)!
 
Heck, according to my flight simulator, I can land a 747 at our local private airport. No big deal.
 
how did they realize the pilot died when the plane went on auto-pilot?
 
  • #10
Ivan Seeking said:
Heck, according to my flight simulator, I can land a 747 at our local private airport. No big deal.
:smile:

Did you know that in the 90's, a flight simulator was hidden in excel as an easter egg?

Just another tidbit of useless knowledge.
 
  • #11
Evo said:
:smile:

Did you know that in the 90's, a flight simulator was hidden in excel as an easter egg?

Just another tidbit of useless knowledge.

I played that simulator. It was Excel 97 I think. You flew around this boring moonscape until you came across this low-angle screen that scrolled the names of all the developers. It wasn't exactly enough to learn how to actually fly.
 
  • #12
I agree that this sounds a bit weird. My only official training was on 150's, 152's and 172's, but I know damned well that I could handle a King Air. In any normal circumstances, there's no difference between the procedures. Just use the trottle, mixture and pitch controls symmetrically and it's fine. The necessity for a twin rating is primarily in the event of an engine failure, which results in asymmetrical thrust. In fact, the Mixmaster (Cessna Skymaster) doesn't require that rating because it's a centreline-thrust twin; one puller and one pusher prop on the same axis.
All of the basic flight and landing procedures are the same, until you get into jet territory or taildraggers.
 
  • #13
Danger said:
I agree that this sounds a bit weird. My only official training was on 150's, 152's and 172's, but I know damned well that I could handle a King Air. In any normal circumstances, there's no difference between the procedures. Just use the trottle, mixture and pitch controls symmetrically and it's fine. The necessity for a twin rating is primarily in the event of an engine failure, which results in asymmetrical thrust. In fact, the Mixmaster (Cessna Skymaster) doesn't require that rating because it's a centreline-thrust twin; one puller and one pusher prop on the same axis.
All of the basic flight and landing procedures are the same, until you get into jet territory or taildraggers.

Technically, a king air is a jet since it has turbo props.
 
  • #14
Cyrus said:
Technically, a king air is a jet since it has turbo props.

True, Cyrus, but the flight procedures are still more in line with a piston craft than something like a Lear Jet. For someone as close to an airport as this bloke was, things like temperature constaints, inlet pressure, etc. don't really become critical. Your rpm's can be way off, and still get you back to the runway.

edit: I'm going by the phrase 'just enjoyed a smooth takeoff' from the article. That implies to me that they weren't more than a couple of minutes out. That might be in error.
 
  • #15
Danger said:
True, Cyrus, but the flight procedures are still more in line with a piston craft than something like a Lear Jet. For someone as close to an airport as this bloke was, things like temperature constaints, inlet pressure, etc. don't really become critical. Your rpm's can be way off, and still get you back to the runway.

edit: I'm going by the phrase 'just experienced a smooth takeoff' from the article. That implies to me that they weren't more than a couple of minutes out. That might be in error.

The only thing he has to be careful about is shutting the engines down so that he doesn't totally destroy them and melt the compressor blades. If he was able to land it safely, he shouldn't just kill them - at least I don't think so. I don't fly turboprop so I don't know the exact procedures. Melting the blades would be a several million dollar oops.
 
  • #16
Cyrus said:
I don't fly turboprop so I don't know the exact procedures. Melting the blades would be a several million dollar oops.
Roger that. As a passenger, though, I'd just be concerned with getting the thing down and stopped in one piece and not give a damn as to whether or not the engines survived. Anything within glide distance of a flat surface is good enough.
 
  • #17
turbo-1 said:
OMG! This plane has too many engines! What do I do?
Just do what you do if it had one: throttle one engine and leave the other one alone!
 
  • #18
russ_watters said:
Just do what you do if it had one: throttle one engine and leave the other one alone!
Despite the lack of a smilie, I'm sure you're joking. I have never been inside a King Air, but having ridden in a lot of other twin-engine turboprops, I have to assume KA's throttles are paired and can be and should be, adjusted in unison.
 
  • #19
turbo-1 said:
Despite the lack of a smilie, I'm sure you're joking. I have never been inside a King Air, but having ridden in a lot of other twin-engine turboprops, I have to assume KA's throttles are paired and can be and should be, adjusted in unison.

...uh, yeah. It was a joke. :rolleyes:
 
  • #20
Cyrus said:
...uh, yeah. It was a joke. :rolleyes:

You never know. Maybe Russ is used to flying Frisbees. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 156 ·
6
Replies
156
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
75K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
26K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K