Passive long range sensor using radio wave distortions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of using radio wave distortions to detect conductive objects without physical contact. The proposed method involves emitting short electric field pulses and analyzing distortions in the wavefront caused by conductive materials. Concerns include the high propagation velocity of waves potentially hindering detection and whether the first wave's distortion would affect the second wave. An alternative method suggests broadcasting a pulsed electric field and measuring the residual electric field, though its detectability is questioned. The conversation highlights skepticism about the concept's novelty compared to existing metal detection technologies.
taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
Greetings PFers,

I was thinking about how it would be possible to "scan" something without having visual or physical contact (and without have a superconducting magnet, etc...)

Lets have this device detect something conductive.
If a device were to emit an electric field pulse of very short duration, then wait and send out another pulse. The antenna would be surrounded by an array of sensors which detects the strength of an electric field in many, many locations. When the first wave encounters the metal object, the wave front will be distorted because of the conductive properties of the object. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the 2nd wave which hasn't propagated outside if the device yet also be distorted? The sensors inside the device would trace the contour of the wave front leaving the device and note any distortions which would be identical to those of the first wave. Utilizing the identical distortions inside the sensor and outside the device, one could effectively scan an object. This sensor wouldn't utilize wave reverberations/ bouncing.

My biggest concerns is the wave propagation velocity would be too high for current technology to detect. Also, the distortion of the first wave might not distort the second wave because both are traveling practically at the speed of light. Am I wrong?

An alternative to the above method is to broadcast a pulsed electric field, when the field passes through matter, it's atoms become polarized momentarily. A sensor in the broadcast device would measure the magnitude of the residual electric field using a 3D matrix of sensors with very high resolution. However, the residual field might be too weak to detect.

I realize this is a long shot...

-Tay
 
Science news on Phys.org
Trying to re-invent the metal detector?

I'm really not clear about your description and what you are trying to accomplish at the top level that is different than a metal detector.

I don't think waves distort other waves. I think that is what you are expecting. You can get interference patterns but the waves themselves don't interact, that is, transfer energy between themselves.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top