Path followed by a space station.

AI Thread Summary
When a space station fires its engine radially outward, it will transition from a circular orbit to an elliptical path due to the conservation of angular momentum. The thrust force alters the station's velocity, making it impossible to maintain a circular orbit since the angular momentum before and after the thrust is not equal. The discussion emphasizes that for a given angular momentum, there is only one corresponding circular orbit, which is disrupted by the engine firing. The centripetal force, which is gravitational in this context, must match perfectly with the required centripetal force for a circular orbit, a condition that is no longer satisfied after the thrust. Thus, the space station will follow an elliptical path instead.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a space station orbiting around the Earth in a circular orbit. If it fires its engine radially outward, will it follow a different circular path or an elliptical path?


The Attempt at a Solution



Since the thrust force is perpendicular to the motion, the angular momentum is conserved. So it should follow an elliptical path.

Is this reasoning correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct, but your reasoning is confusing. Why does the fact that angular momentum is conserved mean that it should follow an elliptical path?
 
V = √(GM/R)
L1 = m√(GMR)

V' = √(GM/R')
L2= m√(GMR')

where,
m - Mass of space station
V - Initial orbital velocity
V' - Final orbital velocity

L1 ≠ L2

So the path cannot be a circle. The other choice is only ellipse (as per the question) :biggrin:
I am interested in knowing the geniune reason though.
 
Can anybody else provide me a reason?
 
Hint: The centripetal force always is: F = mv^2/\rho where \rho is the radius of curvature. If \rho = R where R is the distance between the station and the earth, then the orbit is circular around the earth.

You may want to prove this statement: for a fixed pair of planet M and mass m<<M orbitting around M, for each value of angular momentum L of m, there is one and only one circular orbit corresponding to L.

P.S.: If you want a genuine reason, look at the centripetal force. It's actually gravitational force. When does the gravitational force match *perfectly* with the centripetal force in the case of circular orbit?
 
hikaru1221 said:
You may want to prove this statement: for a fixed pair of planet M and mass m<<M orbitting around M, for each value of angular momentum L of m, there is one and only one circular orbit corresponding to L.

L=mvr=m√(GM/r)r=m√(GMr)
For every 'L' there is one and only one 'r'

hikaru1221 said:
When does the gravitational force match *perfectly* with the centripetal force in the case of circular orbit?

When they both are equal?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top