Path following control robot kinematics and dynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the optimal controller for a mobile robot designed to follow a specific path, particularly focusing on a 4-bar linkage mechanism. A P controller is effectively managing the kinematics, but issues arise when integrating dynamics with a PD controller. There is uncertainty regarding the naming of this control method, as most control loops typically utilize P or PI controllers, with PID being less common. Participants emphasize that the critical factor in control systems is not just the type of controller used, but also the selection of feedback and where the controller output is directed. The conversation highlights the complexity of integrating kinematics and dynamics in robotic control.
theBlue
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a general question regarding what is the best controller (PI, PD, etc.) to control the position of a mobile robot in order to follow a known path.

The mobile robot at hand is a mechanism (a 4 bar linkage with its two base gliding on two parallel but not straight rails) and I want the end effector to follow the center-line between the two rails.

I have a path following controller working perfectly with the kinematics using just a P controller.

The problem occurs when I introduce the Dynamics. The Dynamics controller I am using is a PD.

I am controlling the Dynamics based on the kinematics path following control.

I do not know if this kind of control has a name ?

Thank you for your answer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Most control loops work with just P or PI. PID is seldom needed. PD sounds like a mistake to me. I can't believe that PD is appropriate.

Most critical is not the controller itself. Most critical is selecting where the controller output goes, and what the feedback is.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top